These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10348145)

  • 1. Radial force of coronary stents: a comparative analysis.
    Rieu R; Barragan P; Masson C; Fuseri J; Garitey V; Silvestri M; Roquebert P; Sainsous J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Mar; 46(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 10348145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of stent design on reduction of elastic recoil: a comparison via quantitative intravascular ultrasound.
    Yamamoto Y; Brown DL; Ischinger TA; Arbab-Zadeh A; Penny WF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Jun; 47(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 10376515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical Properties of Five Long Stents Compared.
    Ormiston JA; Ruygrok PN; Webster MW; Stewart JT; White HD
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1998 Apr; 10 Suppl B():35B. PubMed ID: 10973336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of ureteral stent compression.
    Hendlin K; Vedula K; Horn C; Monga M
    Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):679-82. PubMed ID: 16600353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct coronary stent implantation: safety, feasibility, and predictors of success of the strategy of direct coronary stent implantation.
    Laarman G; Muthusamy TS; Swart H; Westendorp I; Kiemeneij F; Slagboom T; van der Wieken R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Apr; 52(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 11285596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Engineering assessment of the longitudinal compression behaviour of contemporary coronary stents.
    Prabhu S; Schikorr T; Mahmoud T; Jacobs J; Potgieter A; Simonton C
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Jun; 8(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 22057097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stent deformation following simulated side-branch dilatation: a comparison of five stent designs.
    Ormiston JA; Webster MW; Ruygrok PN; Stewart JT; White HD; Scott DS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Jun; 47(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 10376516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized comparison of J&J Crown stent versus NIR stent after routine coronary angioplasty.
    Miketic S; Carlsson J; Tebbe U
    Am Heart J; 2001 Nov; 142(5):E8. PubMed ID: 11685183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo assessment of stent recoil in normal porcine arteries: evaluation of contemporary stent designs.
    Garcia LA; Hosley SE; Baim DS; Carrozza JP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Jun; 53(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 11387621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Micro-CT-compatible technique for measuring self-expanding stent forces.
    Nikolov HN; Pelz DM; Lownie SP; Norley CJ; Khan V; Drangova M; Holdsworth DW
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 20346884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Characteristic mechanical properties of balloon-expandable peripheral stent systems].
    Schmidt W; Andresen R; Behrens P; Schmitz KP
    Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1430-7. PubMed ID: 12424671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of ureteral stent compression force and its role in malignant obstruction.
    Christman MS; L'esperance JO; Choe CH; Stroup SP; Auge BK
    J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):392-6. PubMed ID: 19010490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis and stent design: Reduction of dogboning.
    De Beule M; Van Impe R; Verhegghe B; Segers P; Verdonck P
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):233-41. PubMed ID: 17065746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mechanical properties of endovascular stents: an in vitro assessment.
    Johnston CR; Lee K; Flewitt J; Moore R; Dobson GM; Thornton GM
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2010 Sep; 10(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 20717726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elastic recoil of coronary stents: a comparative analysis.
    Barragan P; Rieu R; Garitey V; Roquebert PO; Sainsous J; Silvestri M; Bayet G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2000 May; 50(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 10816295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the trackability, flexibility, and conformability of coronary stents: a comparative analysis.
    Rieu R; Barragan P; Garitey V; Roquebert PO; Fuseri J; Commeau P; Sainsous J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Aug; 59(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 12891615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wire-based ureteral stents: impact on tensile strength and compression.
    Pedro RN; Hendlin K; Kriedberg C; Monga M
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1057-9. PubMed ID: 18158013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative reliability and performance study of different stent designs in terms of mechanical properties: foreshortening, recoil, radial force, and flexibility.
    Kim DB; Choi H; Joo SM; Kim HK; Shin JH; Hwang MH; Choi J; Kim DG; Lee KH; Lim CH; Yoo SK; Lee HM; Sun K
    Artif Organs; 2013 Apr; 37(4):368-79. PubMed ID: 23461583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Absorbable coronary stents. New promising technology].
    Erbel R; Böse D; Haude M; Kordish I; Churzidze S; Malyar N; Konorza T; Sack S
    Herz; 2007 Jun; 32(4):308-19. PubMed ID: 17607538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomised trial of endoluminal reconstruction comparing the NIR stent and the Wallstent in angioplasty of long segment coronary disease: results of the RENEWAL Study.
    Nageh T; de Belder AJ; Thomas MR; Williams IL; Wainwright RJ
    Am Heart J; 2001 Jun; 141(6):971-6. PubMed ID: 11376312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.