300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10348304)
1. Potential role of various dosimetric quality indicators in prostate brachytherapy.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jun; 44(3):717-24. PubMed ID: 10348304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dependence of prostate postimplant dosimetric quality on CT volume determination.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 10421545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of timing on the dosimetric analysis of transperineal ultrasound-guided, prostatic conformal brachytherapy.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Walbert HL
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1998; 6(4):182-90. PubMed ID: 9727878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Potters L; Cao Y; Calugaru E; Torre T; Fearn P; Wang XH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jul; 50(3):605-14. PubMed ID: 11395226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Nag S; Beyer D; Friedland J; Grimm P; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(4):789-99. PubMed ID: 10386635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of dosimetric parameters and disease response after 125 iodine transperineal brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Morris WJ; Keyes M; Palma D; McKenzie M; Spadinger I; Agranovich A; Pickles T; Liu M; Kwan W; Wu J; Lapointe V; Berthelet E; Pai H; Harrison R; Kwa W; Bucci J; Racz V; Woods R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1432-8. PubMed ID: 19036530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rectal dosimetric analysis following prostate brachytherapy.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH; Walbert HL; Blatt HJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(5):1021-7. PubMed ID: 10192350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
Potters L; Calugaru E; Jassal A; Presser J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose-volume conundrum for response of prostate cancer to brachytherapy: summary dosimetric measures and their relationship to tumor control probability.
D'Souza WD; Thames HD; Kuban DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 15050335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.
Yue N; Chen Z; Peschel R; Dicker AP; Waterman FM; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):1063-72. PubMed ID: 10571216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Isotope selection for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy.
Cha CM; Potters L; Ashley R; Freeman K; Wang XH; Waldbaum R; Leibel S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Sep; 45(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 10487561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison between model 9011 and 6711 sources in prostate implants.
Zhang H; Beyer D
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 23510715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial analysis of Pro-Qura: a multi-institutional database of prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.
Merrick GS; Grimm PD; Sylvester J; Blasko JC; Butler WM; Allen ZA; Chaudhry UU; Mazza A; Sitter M
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17284380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Pro-Qura-generated plans on postimplant dosimetric quality: a review of a multi-institutional database.
Allen Z; Merrick GS; Grimm P; Blasko J; Sylvester J; Butler W; Chaudry UU; Sitter M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 18674685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostatic conformal brachytherapy: 125I/103Pd postoperative dosimetric analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Walbert HL
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(6):305-13. PubMed ID: 9436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetry: a comparison between higher and lower source density.
Thomas CW; Kruk A; McGahan CE; Spadinger I; Morris WJ
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Apr; 83(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17368844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
