These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10349362)

  • 1. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
    Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
    Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in the pediatric population. Implications for management and comparison with the adult population.
    Rader AE; Lazebnik R; Arora CD; Franklin J; Abdul-Karim FW
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1073-8. PubMed ID: 9250301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study.
    Kline MJ; Davey DD
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 8725142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
    ChangChien CC; Lin H; Eng HL; Chang WK
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
    Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postmenopausal squamous-cell atypias: a diagnostic challenge.
    Saminathan T; Lahoti C; Kannan V; Kline TS
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 7867464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
    Yang M; Zachariah S
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?
    Malik SN; Wilkinson EJ; Drew PA; Bennett BB; Hardt NS
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 10349365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rescreening of atypical cervicovaginal smears using PAPNET.
    Lerma E; Colomo L; Carreras A; Esteva E; Quilez M; Prat J
    Cancer; 1998 Dec; 84(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9915138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
    Roche DH; Spicer N
    N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
    Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
    Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women.
    Chhieng DC; Elgert P; Cohen JM; Cangiarella JF
    Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11241259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Colposcopic verification of cytologic smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance].
    Pityński K; Basta A; Szczudrawa A; Strama M; Piwowarska E
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10375923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) on Papanicolaou smears.
    Terry RR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1996 Aug; 96(8):465-8. PubMed ID: 8810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
    Keating JT; Wang HH
    Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Howell LP; Davis RL
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.