These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10350302)

  • 21. Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators.
    Berg WA; Blume JD; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB; Madsen EL;
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):693-702. PubMed ID: 16641344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents.
    Singh S; Maxwell J; Baker JA; Nicholas JL; Lo JY
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 20971779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization.
    Berg WA; Blume JD; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):355-65. PubMed ID: 17057064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraobserver interpretation of breast ultrasonography following the BI-RADS classification.
    Calas MJ; Almeida RM; Gutfilen B; Pereira WC
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):525-8. PubMed ID: 19423260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging. Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses.
    Skaane P; Engedal K; Skjennald A
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):497-502. PubMed ID: 9240666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interobserver agreement in sonographic diagnosis of breast tumors.
    Shimamoto K; Sawaki A; Ikede M; Satake H; Naganawa S; Tadokoro M; Isomura T; Hirota H; Ishigaki T
    Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Sep; 8(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 9795006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Skaane P; Engedal K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 9423610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of grayscale typical ultrasonographic patterns for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Guerriero S; Alcazar JL; Pascual MA; Ajossa S; Gerada M; Bargellini R; Virgilio B; Melis GB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1711-6. PubMed ID: 18524459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interreader variability and predictive value of US descriptions of solid breast masses: pilot study.
    Arger PH; Sehgal CM; Conant EF; Zuckerman J; Rowling SE; Patton JA
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 11293782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproducibility of Automated Breast Ultrasonography and Handheld Ultrasonography for Breast Lesion Size Measurement.
    Park KW; Ko EY; Park S; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kwon MR
    Ultrasound Q; 2022 Jan; 38(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 35001027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy.
    Conners AL; Hruska CB; Tortorelli CL; Maxwell RW; Rhodes DJ; Boughey JC; Berg WA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jun; 39(6):971-82. PubMed ID: 22289959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contrast-enhanced helical CT for pulmonary embolism detection: inter- and intraobserver agreement among radiologists with variable experience.
    Chartrand-Lefebvre C; Howarth N; Lucidarme O; Beigelman C; Cluzel P; Mourey-Gérosa I; Cadi M; Grenier P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 9888748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging.
    Wise SW; Labuski MR; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Meilstrup JW; Holley GP; LaRusso SA; Holliman J; Ruggiero FM; Mauger D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):933-41. PubMed ID: 11264081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do radiologists agree on findings in radiographer-acquired sonographic examinations?
    Stenman C; Jamil S; Thorelius L; Knutsson A; Smedby Ö
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Mar; 32(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 23443192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
    Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization.
    Volkers NA; Hehenkamp WJ; Spijkerboer AM; Moolhuijzen AD; Birnie E; Ankum WM; Reekers JA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 18057985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of RECIST assessment in ovarian cancer.
    Krasovitsky M; Lee YC; Sim HW; Chawla T; Moore H; Moses D; Baker L; Mandel C; Kielar A; Hartery A; O'Malley M; Friedlander M; Oza AM; Wang L; Lheureux S; Wilson M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 May; 32(5):656-661. PubMed ID: 35379690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.
    Adibelli ZH; Ergenc R; Oztekin O; Ecevit S; Unal G; Abal Y
    Breast Care (Basel); 2010 Mar; 5(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 22619635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of lesion detection in the transverse and coronal views on automated breast sonography.
    Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 25542948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter- and intra-observer variability of qualitative visual breast-composition assessment in mammography among Japanese physicians: a first multi-institutional observer performance study in Japan.
    Koyama Y; Nakashima K; Orihara S; Tsunoda H; Kimura F; Uenaka N; Ban K; Michishita Y; Kanemaki Y; Kurihara A; Tawaraya K; Taguri M; Ishikawa T; Uematsu T
    Breast Cancer; 2024 Jul; 31(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 38619787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.