184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10350934)
1. OIG opinion is cause for concern.
Schanz SJ
Telemed Today; 1999 Feb; 7(1):11. PubMed ID: 10350934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. OIG increases amount, scope of civil money penalties for fraud.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 May; 8(10):4-6. PubMed ID: 11066242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tread carefully . When it comes to physician referrals, a few tips will help you avoid violating antikickback law.
English J; Bogart SP; McManus MK
Mark Health Serv; 2007; 27(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 17896639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Centers for medicare and medicaid now scrutinizing leasing arrangements.
Travis NL; Wool HS; Chananie SJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):683-5. PubMed ID: 17903751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. OIG advisory opinion refines joint venture analysis.
McGinty C; Herron S
GHA Today; 2003 Jun; 47(6):3. PubMed ID: 12866314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. OIG offers guidance on the legality of telemedicine arrangements.
Stewart EE
Healthc Financ Manage; 2000 Jun; 54(6):71-2. PubMed ID: 11010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The stark reality about shared nuclear medicine imaging equipment leasing arrangements after January 1, 2007.
Travis NL; Chananie SJ; Finnegan JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Dec; 3(12):910-3. PubMed ID: 17412200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gainsharing: a cost-reduction strategy that may be back.
Reynolds M
Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Jan; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11806320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The new ASC safe harbor: the triumph of public policy over legal consistency.
Herring DH
J Health Law; 2000; 33(3):485-518. PubMed ID: 11184357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Stark Act--joint ventures.
Becker S
Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Sep; ():11-6. PubMed ID: 10186113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. OIG study sounds warning on hospital ownership of physician practices.
Roeder KH
GHA Today; 1999 Oct; 43(10):3, 9. PubMed ID: 11183410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives. Regulation run amok? Stark II proposal draws cacophony of comment.
Havighurst C
Med Health; 1998 Aug; 52(33):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10339133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint ventures scrutinized anew.
Sollins HL
Provider; 2004 Mar; 30(3):43-4. PubMed ID: 15040056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. OIG advises that marketing/distribution arrangement may violate anti-kickback provision.
Ramsey RB
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1998 May; ():19-22. PubMed ID: 10181979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. OIG approves 'safe harbors' for ambulatory surgery centers.
Abruzzo MD
Manag Care; 1999 Dec; 8(12):60-1. PubMed ID: 11185282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ambulatory surgery center proposals bring mixed response from OIG.
Roeder KH; Jalo V
GHA Today; 2003 Apr; 47(4):3, 8. PubMed ID: 12811931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Venturing into the Labyrinth of Stark: impact of Stark Law and Stark I regulations on integrated delivery systems.
Weiser SJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(6):313-26, 372. PubMed ID: 10156296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. OIG targets contractual joint ventures.
O'Hare PK
Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Sep; 57(9):56-60. PubMed ID: 14503145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The state of gainsharing arrangements.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12148481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The white coat syndrome.
Hirsch WR
J Cardiovasc Manag; 1998; 9(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 10185110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
