BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10351593)

  • 1. Counterpoint: public disclosure of process and outcome measures.
    Scheckler WE
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1999; 7(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 10351593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public disclosure of process and outcome measures.
    Wolfe S
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1999; 7(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 10351592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An approach to measuring and comparing performance and improvement in hospitals.
    Coldiron JS
    Med Health R I; 2001 Nov; 84(11):356-60. PubMed ID: 12355662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meet the mandate to measure clinical quality.
    Pasternak DP; Pine M
    Physician Exec; 1997; 23(7):40-3. PubMed ID: 10170421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HCFA surveys the surveyors.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Apr; 23(4):61-4. PubMed ID: 10177876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ark. health data effort lacks specifics.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1996 Sep; 26(39):36, 40. PubMed ID: 10161895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking data for home care are scarce.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 Feb; 5(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 10177994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Get ready for emphasis on quality measures.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2004 Dec; 12(12):181, 189-90. PubMed ID: 15580816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mortality data won't die.
    QRC Advis; 1992 Sep; 8(11):1-5. PubMed ID: 10121003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance measures required, but which ones? Joint Commission flexible on chosen measures.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1995 Dec; 20(12):173-6. PubMed ID: 10152525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. JCAHO, HCFA surveys inconsistent--GAO.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Jun; 20(24):2. PubMed ID: 10105082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using a state-of-the-art approach. Evaluating hospital quality means comparing patient outcomes by various methods.
    Smith GR
    Bus Health; 1988 Sep; 5(11):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10288835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures of surgical quality: what will patients know by 2005?
    Broder MS; Payne-Simon L; Brook RH
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Jun; 11(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 15869551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding JCAHO's latest PI (performance improvement) revisions.
    Homa-Lowry J
    Hosp Case Manag; 1998 Jul; 6(7):141-2, 147-8. PubMed ID: 10181274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hospital survey process is evaluated. Two-year assessment by the Office of Inspector General.
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2000 Jan; 16(5):7. PubMed ID: 10788013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Government releases hospital quality oversight report.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1999; 19(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 10662018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What does state licensure and JCAHO accreditation of hospitals do for the public?
    King S
    Oreg Nurse; 1999 Dec; 64(4):4. PubMed ID: 12024576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Despite cost and risk, ORYX PLUS offers benchmarking bonanza.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 Feb; 5(2):13-8. PubMed ID: 10177993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. JCAHO may give quality data to HCFA.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(4):6. PubMed ID: 10291667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.