392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10351614)
1. HCFA to allow imposition of CMPs (civil monetary penalties) up to $10,000 for single violations.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Apr; 7(7):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 10351614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding administrative appeals.
Bianculli JL
Provider; 1999 Feb; 25(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 10345492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing homes face quality-of-care scrutiny under the False Claims Act.
Landsberg BS; Keville TD
Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Jan; 55(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 11211488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HCFA proposes modifications to verification of compliance policy.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Mar; 9(6):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 11302012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Paying the piper: HCFA guidance on survey revisits raises concerns about continuation of penalties.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Oct; 8(21):3-4. PubMed ID: 11213763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term care under fire: a case for rational enforcement.
Brady JG
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):1-51. PubMed ID: 15255056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HCFA guidance to surveyors encourages immediate jeopardy citations, industry group warns.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Aug; 8(17):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 11186783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing home care: ensuring quality.
Benjamin GC
Physician Exec; 1998; 24(6):64-5. PubMed ID: 10351722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survey to stress quality assurance.
Wagner L
Provider; 1995 Jul; 21(7):37-8. PubMed ID: 10143788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. National report calls for more teeth in implementing enforcement remedies.
Weiss HP
Balance; 1999; 3(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 10346527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HCFA releases nursing home sanctions.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1994 Nov; 24(46):6. PubMed ID: 10138214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Just how appealing is the prospect of appealing?
Fogg RJ
Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Jan; 22(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 10557743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HCFA to step up enforcement of nursing home initiatives in second year; facilities could face tougher scrutiny.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jul; 7(14):1-3. PubMed ID: 10539472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Industry groups fault GAO reports for failing to address real problems with enforcement system.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Apr; 7(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 10351613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nursing home reform: objective regulation or subjective decisions?
Robbins MK
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Jan; (191):9-35. PubMed ID: 10144586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole new ballgame--providers prepare for enforcement.
Burgess KL
Provider; 1995 Feb; 21(2):41-2, 44, 46. PubMed ID: 10140828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HCFA cleans up survey procedures.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Feb; 17(2):22. PubMed ID: 10134013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HCFA issues procedures for imposing penalties for Medicare/Medicaid violations.
Patient Acc; 1999 Jan; 22(1):1, 4. PubMed ID: 10345761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. HCFA gives progress report on oversight, enforcement of nursing facilities; 100 homes targeted.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Oct; 6(20):1-2. PubMed ID: 10185937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Problems persist with enforcement rule. Surveys find most facilities out of compliance as moratorium ends.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1995 Nov; 21(11):25-6. PubMed ID: 10152227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
