392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10351614)
21. Civil monetary penalties may be liability for successor owners of facility. Deerbrook Pavilion, LLC v. Shalala.
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2001; 21(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 11507944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Unlocking the door to corporate compliance.
Burgess KL
Provider; 1999 Jul; 25(7):suppl 11-2. PubMed ID: 10539076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Standards of care and sanctions for breaches: the survey process in long-term care.
Chester CF
J Long Term Care Adm; 1989; 17(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 10304017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Linking payment and quality. Quality measurement and prospective payment will hinge on electronic transmission of MDS data.
Fisher C
Provider; 1998 Mar; 24(3):26-7, 29-30, 33-7. PubMed ID: 10177186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Lawmakers press for stepped up oversight of nursing facilities.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Aug; 6(16):2-4. PubMed ID: 10182230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Update on nursing home care in Oklahoma.
Winn P; Longanacre C; Prather G
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2001 Aug; 94(8):350-4. PubMed ID: 11515384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. HCFA defends its record to ensure quality of care.
Weiss HP
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Nov; 9(11):17-20, 118, 121. PubMed ID: 10281245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medicare and Medicaid programs; civil money penalties for nursing homes. Final Rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2011 Mar; 76(53):15106-28. PubMed ID: 21434455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. GAO: HCFA failed to sanction Calif. nursing homes.
Weissenstein E
Mod Healthc; 1998 Aug; 28(31):8. PubMed ID: 10183057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicare and Medicaid programs; provider appeals: technical amendments--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
Fed Regist; 1996 Jun; 61(122):32347-51. PubMed ID: 10158604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. HCFA lifts moratorium on SNF fines, directs states to review CMPs.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Mar; 5(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 10165656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Rewriting the book on quality.
Gold MF
Provider; 1999 Jul; 25(7):suppl 2-4. PubMed ID: 10539079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Improve your compliance record in 2001.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2000 Dec; 8(26):1-3. PubMed ID: 11291140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Enforcement heats up as HCFA and Congress spar.
Fogg RJ
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Dec; 21(12):43. PubMed ID: 10346156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Complying with OIG's 2002 work plan.
Herschaman GW; Wasserman MR
Provider; 2002 Jan; 28(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 15991454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Section F-314 through a long-term care surveyor's eyes.
Turnbull GB
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Sep; 51(9):16-7. PubMed ID: 16353386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Overdue nursing homes rules out.
Thomas P
Med World News; 1989 Feb; 30(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 10303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Nursing homes file suit.
Packer J
Mod Healthc; 1991 May; 21(20):11. PubMed ID: 10110719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Focus on caregiving. Learning to love the MDS.
Littlehale S
Provider; 2001 May; 27(5):51-3. PubMed ID: 11840634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. New survey process expands sanctions. HCFA proposes more enforcement remedies and broader disclosure requirements for nursing facilities.
Grimaldi PL
Health Prog; 1992 Nov; 73(9):52-5. PubMed ID: 10122080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
