125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10351747)
21. Assessing non-clinical outcomes.
Kellie SE
QA Rev; 1991 Jul; 3(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 10114870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Lumbar discectomy: practice analysis and care guide.
Saunders R
Hosp Case Manag; 1997 Oct; 5(10):181-4. PubMed ID: 10173317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The appropriateness of medical services.
Kosecoff J; Fink A; Chassin MR; Brook RH
Healthspan; 1987 Jun; 4(6):18-21. PubMed ID: 10283095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Commentary: when is a practice guideline only a guideline?
Zonana H
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 18802176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. National study probes ties between 'best practices,' surgical infection.
Patterson P
OR Manager; 2009 Feb; 25(2):1, 7-8. PubMed ID: 19274972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Drug use benchmarks show surprising geographic variation.
Capitation Rates Data; 2002 Mar; 7(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 11915510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Physician, inform thyself. With better data, doctors learn what works--and what doesn't.
Ludtke M
Time; 1989 Jun; 133(26):71. PubMed ID: 10293555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Using data to improve clinical effectiveness: an orthopedic case study.
Rosenstein AH; Moore K
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996; 14(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10156233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Preventive services in the primary care practices of the Practice Partner Research Network.
Jenkins RG; Ornstein SM
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Feb; 20(3):80-4. PubMed ID: 10747438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Provider profiling: doing it right.
Diamond LH
Healthplan; 2000; 41(3):74-5, 78-82. PubMed ID: 11066253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. CPGs may not be best for older patients.
Hosp Case Manag; 2005 Dec; 13(12):185-6. PubMed ID: 16315577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in primary care: a systematic analysis of roles and challenges.
Power TJ; Mautone JA; Manz PH; Frye L; Blum NJ
Pediatrics; 2008 Jan; 121(1):e65-72. PubMed ID: 18166546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Limited information technology for patient care in physician offices.
Reed MC; Grossman JM
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2004 Sep; (89):1-6. PubMed ID: 15462047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Get providers the data they need to manage risk successfully.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2000 Jul; 7(7):105-9. PubMed ID: 11067409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Best of care: most difficult of circumstances.
Cohen B
Caring; 2007 Jan; 26(1):12-8, 20-3. PubMed ID: 19361129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Here come some real medical cops.
Thomas MC
Med Econ; 1988 Nov; 65(23):21-2, 24-5. PubMed ID: 10290164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. By the numbers. Examining the appropriateness of care.
Stanton M
Healthplan; 1999; 40(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 10537464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Practice parameters. An opportunity for pathologists to take a leadership role in patient care.
Speicher CE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Aug; 114(8):823-4. PubMed ID: 2375655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Beyond traditional notions of validity: selecting appropriate measures for occupational therapy practice.
Zur B; Johnson A; Roy E; Laliberte Rudman D; Wells J
Aust Occup Ther J; 2012 Jun; 59(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 22690775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality care and practice variation: the roles of practice guidelines and public profiles.
Margo CE
Surv Ophthalmol; 2004; 49(3):359-71. PubMed ID: 15110672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
