These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10352552)

  • 1. The usefulness of partial information: effects of go probability in the choice/Nogo task.
    Low KA; Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 1999 May; 36(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 10352552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task.
    Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Apr; 35(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 8507742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study.
    Bruin KJ; Wijers AA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jul; 113(7):1172-82. PubMed ID: 12088714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: an ERP and fMRI study.
    Smith JL; Jamadar S; Provost AL; Michie PT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 22885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming.
    Kopp B; Mattler U; Goertz R; Rist F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 99(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 8758967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects of LRP onset.
    OosmanA ; Moore CM; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):111-27. PubMed ID: 8525867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention-related modulation of frontal midline theta oscillations in cingulate cortex during a spatial cueing Go/NoGo task.
    Hong X; Sun J; Wang J; Li C; Tong S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Feb; 148():1-12. PubMed ID: 31857191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.