These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10352559)

  • 1. The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time.
    Doucet C; Stelmack RM
    Psychophysiology; 1999 May; 36(3):351-63. PubMed ID: 10352559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An event-related potential analysis of extraversion and individual differences in cognitive processing speed and response execution.
    Doucet C; Stelmack RM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 May; 78(5):956-64. PubMed ID: 10821201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual and response interference in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and the effects of methylphenidate.
    Jonkman LM; Kemner C; Verbaten MN; Van Engeland H; Kenemans JL; Camfferman G; Buitelaar JK; Koelega HS
    Psychophysiology; 1999 Jul; 36(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 10432791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Perceptual conflict and response competition: event-related potentials of the stroop effect].
    Bekçi B; Karakaş S
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2009; 20(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 19504363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined expectancies: event-related potentials reveal the early benefits of spatial attention that are obscured by reaction time measures.
    Handy TC; Green V; Klein RM; Mangun GR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):303-17. PubMed ID: 11318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hippocampal negative event-related potential recorded in humans during a simple sensorimotor task occurs independently of motor execution.
    Roman R; Brázdil M; Chládek J; Rektor I; Jurák P; Světlák M; Damborská A; Shaw DJ; Kukleta M
    Hippocampus; 2013 Dec; 23(12):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23893909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The electrophysiological correlates of stimulus visibility and metacontrast masking.
    Railo H; Koivisto M
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):794-803. PubMed ID: 19268608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with perceptual and motor factors in a visual choice reaction time task.
    Adam JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2000 Sep; 105(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11056999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event related potentials during covert orientation of visual attention: effects of cue validity and directionality.
    Wright MJ; Geffen GM; Geffen LB
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Oct; 41(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 8534791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P3 event-related evoked potential in young adults.
    Tandon OP
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1990 Jul; 34(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 2286422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the transmission of sensory input into motor output between introverts and extraverts: Behavioral and psychophysiological analyses.
    Stahl J; Rammsayer T
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Dec; 56(3):293-303. PubMed ID: 15522767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Late positive ERP peaks observed in stimulus-response compatibility tasks tested under speed-accuracy instructions.
    Christensen CA; Ivkovich D; Drake KJ
    Psychophysiology; 2001 May; 38(3):404-16. PubMed ID: 11352129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.