These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10353140)

  • 1. Optimized pulse durations minimize the effect of polarity reversal on defibrillation efficacy with biphasic shocks.
    Schauerte P; Schöndube FA; Grossmann M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 May; 22(5):790-7. PubMed ID: 10353140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt.
    Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1753-9. PubMed ID: 10642128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of first-phase polarity of biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold with a single transvenous lead system.
    Strickberger SA; Man KC; Daoud E; Neary MP; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Hummel JD; Morady F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1605-8. PubMed ID: 7759712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of polarity on defibrillation thresholds using a biphasic waveform in a hot can electrode system.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Nadzam GR; Hills DG; Kroll MW; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 20(12 Pt 1):2911-6. PubMed ID: 9455750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of polarity reversal on defibrillation success with biphasic shocks and a transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillator system in a porcine animal model.
    Stellbrink C; Schauerte P; Loeser H; Rosenbaum C; Kuckertz E; Vogel M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Schoendube FA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1435-41. PubMed ID: 9670188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ventricular defibrillation with triphasic waveforms.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1324-8. PubMed ID: 10725294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system.
    Usui M; Walcott GP; Strickberger SA; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of phase duration of biphasic waveforms on defibrillation energy requirements with a 70-microF capacitance.
    Schauerte P; Schöndube FA; Grossmann M; Dörge H; Stein F; Dohmen B; Moumen A; Erena K; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C
    Circulation; 1998 May; 97(20):2073-8. PubMed ID: 9610539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polarity reversal improves defibrillation efficacy in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter defibrillator implantation with biphasic shocks.
    Schauerte P; Stellbrink C; Schöndube FA; Löser H; Haltern G; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 1):301-6. PubMed ID: 9058867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations.
    Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements.
    Strickberger SA; Daoud E; Goyal R; Chan KK; Bogun F; Castellani M; Harvey M; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Man KC; Morady F
    Am Heart J; 1996 May; 131(5):961-5. PubMed ID: 8615317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 9(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 14618062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms.
    Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective defibrillation in pigs using interleaved and common phase sequential biphasic shocks.
    Guse PA; Rollins DL; Krassowska W; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Aug; 16(8):1719-34. PubMed ID: 7690941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of single-biphasic versus sequential-biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold in pigs.
    Csanadi Z; Jones DL; Wood GK; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jun; 20(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 9227756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shock timing lowers transvenous defibrillation energy requirement.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Lang DJ; Jones JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():35-40. PubMed ID: 9988003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.