These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10353915)

  • 1. Using maximum likelihood to estimate population size from temporal changes in allele frequencies.
    Williamson EG; Slatkin M
    Genetics; 1999 Jun; 152(2):755-61. PubMed ID: 10353915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical Bayes procedure for estimating genetic distance between populations and effective population size.
    Kitada S; Hayashi T; Kishino H
    Genetics; 2000 Dec; 156(4):2063-79. PubMed ID: 11102396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations.
    Anderson AD; Weir BS
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):421-40. PubMed ID: 17339212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of population growth or decline in genetically monitored populations.
    Beaumont MA
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1139-60. PubMed ID: 12871921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pseudo-likelihood method for estimating effective population size from temporally spaced samples.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2001 Dec; 78(3):243-57. PubMed ID: 11865714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood-based estimation of the effective population size using temporal changes in allele frequencies: a genealogical approach.
    Berthier P; Beaumont MA; Cornuet JM; Luikart G
    Genetics; 2002 Feb; 160(2):741-51. PubMed ID: 11861575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Best linear unbiased allele-frequency estimation in complex pedigrees.
    McPeek MS; Wu X; Ober C
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 15180661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating effective population size or mutation rate with microsatellites.
    Xu H; Fu YX
    Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):555-63. PubMed ID: 15020444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Population-genetic inference from pooled-sequencing data.
    Lynch M; Bost D; Wilson S; Maruki T; Harrison S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 6(5):1210-8. PubMed ID: 24787620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating effective population size from temporally spaced samples with a novel, efficient maximum-likelihood algorithm.
    Hui TY; Burt A
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):285-93. PubMed ID: 25747459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum-likelihood and markov chain monte carlo approaches to estimate inbreeding and effective size from allele frequency changes.
    Laval G; SanCristobal M; Chevalet C
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1189-204. PubMed ID: 12871924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PopHist: inferring population history from the spectrum of allele frequencies.
    Wooding S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Mar; 19(4):539-40. PubMed ID: 12611810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population.
    Bink MC; Anderson AD; van de Weg WE; Thompson EA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Oct; 117(6):843-55. PubMed ID: 18592205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the Effective Population Size from Temporal Allele Frequency Changes in Experimental Evolution.
    Jónás Á; Taus T; Kosiol C; Schlötterer C; Futschik A
    Genetics; 2016 Oct; 204(2):723-735. PubMed ID: 27542959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal and microgeographic variation in allozyme frequencies in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii.
    Barker JS; East PD; Weir BS
    Genetics; 1986 Mar; 112(3):577-611. PubMed ID: 3957005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating Allele Frequencies.
    Adrianto I; Montgomery C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():61-81. PubMed ID: 28980242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods for estimating gene frequencies and detecting selection in bacterial populations.
    Rannala B; Qiu WG; Dykhuizen DE
    Genetics; 2000 Jun; 155(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 10835376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.