These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10354833)

  • 21. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
    Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994.
    Gaudette LA; Altmayer CA; Nobrega KM; Lee J
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(3):17-27(Eng); 19-30(Fre). PubMed ID: 9085118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Screening for breast cancer.
    Miller AB
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1983; 3(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 6351949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Laya MB; Larson EB; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):643-9. PubMed ID: 8627640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Followup after 11 years--update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial.
    Frisell J; Lidbrink E; Hellström L; Rutqvist LE
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1997 Sep; 45(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9386870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survival advantage differences by age. Evaluation of the extended follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Byrne C; Smart CR; Chu KC; Hartmann WH
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):301-10. PubMed ID: 8004601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: few new data.
    Prescrire Int; 2008 Feb; 17(93):24-7. PubMed ID: 18383654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
    Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women.
    Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Feb; Doc No 32():[23,227 words; 195 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8305999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.
    Buist DS; Porter PL; Lehman C; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1432-40. PubMed ID: 15467032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996. The Database Management Subcommittee to the National Committee for the Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Initiative.
    Paquette D; Snider J; Bouchard F; Olivotto I; Bryant H; Decker K; Doyle G
    CMAJ; 2000 Oct; 163(9):1133-8. PubMed ID: 11079057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Service screening with mammography of women aged 50-69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer.
    Jonsson H; Nyström L; Törnberg S; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 11678556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy.
    Lee CH
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):395-407. PubMed ID: 12117183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast cancer mortality after screening mammography in British Columbia women.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Warren L; Kan L
    Int J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 120(5):1076-80. PubMed ID: 17149701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of annual mammographic screening in women starting at age 40. Trial Steering Group.
    Moss S
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 10572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term risk of false-positive screening results and subsequent biopsy as a function of mammography use.
    Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Kopans DB; Moore R; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Smith BL; Tanabe KK; Michaelson JS
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 16864665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.