These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10355240)

  • 1. Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):512-25. PubMed ID: 10355240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of age and divided attention on memory components derived for the category exemplar generation task.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Woo E
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 May; 14(3):274-300. PubMed ID: 17453561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of attention on perceptual implicit memory.
    Rajaram S; Srinivas K; Travers S
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):920-30. PubMed ID: 11820751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of divided attention on automatic and controlled components of memory after severe closed-head injury.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Nissley HM
    Neuropsychology; 2000 Oct; 14(4):559-69. PubMed ID: 11055258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of divided attention and time course on automatic and controlled components of memory in older adults.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M
    Psychol Aging; 1999 Jun; 14(2):331-45. PubMed ID: 10403719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.
    Toth JP; Reingold EM; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):290-303. PubMed ID: 8151274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Divided attention and indirect memory tests.
    Mulligan NW; Hartman M
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 8757494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.
    Vaidya CJ; Gabrieli JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1165-72. PubMed ID: 11126939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jan; 24(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 9438952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for a generate-recognize model of episodic influences on word-stem completion.
    Bodner GE; Masson ME; Caldwell JI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):267-93. PubMed ID: 10764097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consequences of violating the assumption of independence in the process dissociation procedure: a word fragment completion study.
    Russo R; Cullis AM; Parkin AJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):617-32. PubMed ID: 9701954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unconscious perception: attention, awareness, and control.
    Debner JA; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):304-17. PubMed ID: 8151275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit and explicit memory in pregnant women: an analysis of data-driven and conceptually driven processes.
    McDowall J; Moriarty R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):729-40. PubMed ID: 10994227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling the unconscious: attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuomotor processes differentially.
    Martens U; Ansorge U; Kiefer M
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Feb; 22(2):282-91. PubMed ID: 21245492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation between two types of skill learning tasks: the differential effect of divided attention.
    Vakil E; Hoffman Y
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Aug; 26(5):653-66. PubMed ID: 15370387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does organization improve priming?
    Rappold VA; Hashtroudi S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 1826727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: new findings and theoretical implications.
    Challis BH; Velichkovsky BM; Craik FI
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):142-64. PubMed ID: 8733928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.