These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10355382)

  • 1. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
    Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: the effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone).
    Beebe TJ; Davern ME; McAlpine DD; Call KT; Rockwood TH
    Med Care; 2005 Apr; 43(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 15778644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.
    Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of small monetary incentives to convert survey non-respondents: a randomized control trial.
    Griffin JM; Simon AB; Hulbert E; Stevenson J; Grill JP; Noorbaloochi S; Partin MR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():81. PubMed ID: 21615955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct-to-Member Household or Targeted Mailings: Incentivizing Medicaid Calls for Quitline Services.
    Hood-Medland EA; Dove MS; Stewart SL; Cummins SE; Kirby C; Vela C; Kohatsu ND; Tong EK
    Am J Prev Med; 2018 Dec; 55(6 Suppl 2):S178-S185. PubMed ID: 30454672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal design features for surveying low-income populations.
    Fredrickson DD; Jones TL; Molgaard CA; Carman CG; Schukman J; Dismuke SE; Ablah E
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2005 Nov; 16(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 16311492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.
    Reinisch JF; Yu DC; Li WY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26418779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives.
    Asch DA; Christakis NA; Ubel PA
    Med Care; 1998 Jan; 36(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 9431335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies.
    Smith MG; Witte M; Rocha S; Basner M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):230. PubMed ID: 31805869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a gift certificate incentive and specialized delivery on prostate cancer survivors' response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Bakan J; Chen B; Medeiros-Nancarrow C; Hu JC; Kantoff PW; Recklitis CJ
    J Geriatr Oncol; 2014 Apr; 5(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 24495697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surveying adolescents enrolled in a regional health care delivery organization: mail and phone follow-up--what works at what cost?
    Richards J; Wiese C; Katon W; Rockhill C; McCarty C; Grossman D; McCauley E; Richardson LP
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2010; 23(4):534-41. PubMed ID: 20616296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing payments to subjects of mail surveys: cost-effectiveness and bias.
    Schweitzer M; Asch DA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 48(11):1325-9. PubMed ID: 7490595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Jun; 20(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10183321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.