These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10355639)

  • 21. CAD/CAM evaluation of the fit of trans-tibial sockets for trans-tibial amputation stumps.
    Isozaki K; Hosoda M; Masuda T; Morita S
    J Med Dent Sci; 2006 Mar; 53(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16722145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling and simulation of muscle forces of trans-tibial amputee to study effect of prosthetic alignment.
    Fang L; Jia X; Wang R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1125-31. PubMed ID: 17942203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A patient with donning-related stump wounds: a case report.
    Baars EC; Geertzen JH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Jun; 32(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 18569889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in interface pressure and stump shape over time: preliminary results from a trans-tibial amputee subject.
    Sanders JE; Greve JM; Clinton C; Hafner BJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Aug; 24(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 11061203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CIR sand casting system for trans-tibial socket.
    Wu Y; Casanova H; Smith WK; Edwards M; Childress DS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Aug; 27(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 14571945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A questionnaire survey of the effect of different interface types on patient satisfaction and perceived problems among trans-tibial amputees.
    Van de Weg FB; Van der Windt DA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 16466153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
    Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
    Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Functional effects of a prosthetic torsion adapter in trans-tibial amputees during unplanned spin and step turns.
    Heitzmann DW; Pieschel K; Alimusaj M; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):558-65. PubMed ID: 26195621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sand-casting technique for trans-tibial prostheses.
    Jensen JS; Poetsma PA; Thanh NH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Aug; 29(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 16281725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Criteria for socket type prescription: indications and contraindications of a liner system].
    Horter MJ; Wieners E; Wühr J; Kirch H; Budny T; Schüling S; Wetz HH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2013 Feb; 151(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 23423593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: a comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis.
    Narita H; Yokogushi K; Shii S; Kakizawa M; Nosaka T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9453088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of liner stiffness for trans-tibial prosthesis: a finite element contact model.
    Lin CC; Chang CH; Wu CL; Chung KC; Liao IC
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jan; 26(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14644593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Removable rigid dressings versus soft dressings: a randomized, controlled study with dysvascular, trans-tibial amputees.
    Deutsch A; English RD; Vermeer TC; Murray PS; Condous M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Aug; 29(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 16281728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stump ulcers and continued prosthetic limb use.
    Salawu A; Middleton C; Gilbertson A; Kodavali K; Neumann V
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 17162518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hanging stump prosthesis without socket for bad above-knee stumps.
    Chand N; Srivastava RK; Maish AR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Dec; 9(3):154-6. PubMed ID: 4088844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparative study of the volume difference vs. healthy limb, morphological and population description in transfemoral amputees].
    Mendoza-Cruz F; Rodríguez-Reyes G; Galván Duque-Gastélum C; Alvarez-Camacho M
    Rev Invest Clin; 2014 Jul; 66 Suppl 1():S85-93. PubMed ID: 25264803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The performance of the ICEROSS prostheses amongst transtibial amputees with a special reference to the workplace--a preliminary study. Icelandic Roll on Silicone Socket.
    Dasgupta AK; McCluskie PJ; Patel VS; Robins L
    Occup Med (Lond); 1997 May; 47(4):228-36. PubMed ID: 9231496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.