These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10355641)

  • 21. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions.
    Board WJ; Street GM; Caspers C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Dec; 25(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 11860094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
    Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Results of the pilot phase of a clinical evaluation of computer aided design of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets.
    Holden JM; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Dec; 10(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 3808920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Technical note: Computer-manufactured inserts for prosthetic sockets.
    Sanders JE; McLean JB; Cagle JC; Gardner DW; Allyn KJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Aug; 38(8):801-6. PubMed ID: 27212209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of a direct manufacturing prosthetic socket system in a rural community in South Africa: A pilot study and lessons for future research.
    Ennion L; Johannesson A; Rhoda A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):455-462. PubMed ID: 28103760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Real-time patient-specific finite element analysis of internal stresses in the soft tissues of a residual limb: a new tool for prosthetic fitting.
    Portnoy S; Yarnitzky G; Yizhar Z; Kristal A; Oppenheim U; Siev-Ner I; Gefen A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):120-35. PubMed ID: 17120139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New Socket-Less Prosthesis concept facilitating comfortable and abrasion-free cycling after Van Nes rotationplasty.
    Scheepers LG; Storcken JO; Rings F; van Horn Y; Seelen HA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 24429482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An experimental and theoretical framework for manufacturing prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees.
    Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Crawford RH; Rogers WE; Bosker G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 17009490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automated fabrication of mobility aids (AFMA): below-knee CASD/CAM testing and evaluation program results.
    Houston VL; Burgess EM; Childress DS; Lehneis HR; Mason CP; Garbarini MA; LaBlanc KP; Boone DA; Chan RB; Harlan JH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(4):78-124. PubMed ID: 1432729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
    Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
    Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preliminary experiences with the CIR casting system for transtibial prosthetic sockets.
    Thanh NH; Poetsma PA; Jensen JS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 19367516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integration of surface electromyographic sensors with the transfemoral amputee socket: a comparison of four differing configurations.
    Hefferman GM; Zhang F; Nunnery MJ; Huang H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 24469430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?
    Sanders JE; Severance MR; Allyn KJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):567-82. PubMed ID: 22773260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A questionnaire survey of the effect of different interface types on patient satisfaction and perceived problems among trans-tibial amputees.
    Van de Weg FB; Van der Windt DA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 16466153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses.
    Boone DA; Kobayashi T; Chou TG; Arabian AK; Coleman KL; Orendurff MS; Zhang M
    Gait Posture; 2013 Apr; 37(4):620-6. PubMed ID: 23177920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 3D reconstruction of the structure of a residual limb for customising the design of a prosthetic socket.
    Shuxian Z; Wanhua Z; Bingheng L
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jan; 27(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15604007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A CAD analysis programme for prosthetics and orthotics.
    Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 7991360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laboratory and clinical tests of a prototype pressure sensor for clincial assessment of prosthetic socket fit.
    Polliack AA; Craig DD; Sieh RC; Landsberger S; Mcneal DR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Apr; 26(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 12043923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An open socket technique for through-knee amputations in relation to skin problems of the stump: an explorative study.
    Otter N; Postema K; Rijken RA; van Limbeek J
    Clin Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 10327095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.