These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10355838)

  • 1. Medpor Motility Coupling Post: a rabbit model.
    Choi JC; Iwamoto MA; Bstandig S; Rubin PA; Shore JW
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 May; 15(3):190-201. PubMed ID: 10355838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary placement of a titanium motility post in a porous polyethylene orbital implant: animal model with quantitative assessment of fibrovascular ingrowth and vascular density.
    Hsu WC; Green JP; Spilker MH; Rubin PA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):370-9. PubMed ID: 11021387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model.
    Jordan DR; Brownstein S; Dorey M; Yuen VH; Gilberg S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Mar; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 15083083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porous polyethylene as a spacer graft in the treatment of lower eyelid retraction.
    Morton AD; Nelson C; Ikada Y; Elner VM
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Mar; 16(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 10749162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free orbital fat graft to prevent porous polyethylene orbital implant exposure in patients with retinoblastoma.
    Kim NJ; Choung HK; Khwarg SI; Yu YS
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jul; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 16052135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of vascularization of Medpor and Medpor-Plus orbital implants: a prospective, randomized study.
    Naik MN; Murthy RK; Honavar SG
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 18030118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetically integrated microporous implant: safety and efficacy of secondary posting.
    Escalona-Benz E; Benz MS; Murray TG; Hayden BC; Hernandez E; Garonzik SN; Cicciarelli NL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Nov; 121(11):1596-600. PubMed ID: 14609918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary placement of a motility coupling post in porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Rubin PA; Fay AM; Remulla HD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 118(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 10865322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oculoplastic and orbital applications of porous high-density polyethylene implants.
    Purdy EP
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 1997 Oct; 8(5):57-63. PubMed ID: 10174260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of high density porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in 266 cases].
    Cui HG; Li HY; Chen YH
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 16736619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The survival of freely grafted orbital fat on porous polyethylene orbital implants in the rabbit.
    Kim NJ; Choung HK; Khwarg SI
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 17004626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects and complications of placement of motility coupling post in porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Cui HG; Hu RR; Li HY; Han W
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2008 Jun; 9(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 18543399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of early fibrovascular proliferation according to orbital implant in orbital floor fracture reconstruction.
    Lee H; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1518-23. PubMed ID: 22976649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome of smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene orbital implants (Medpor SST) in children with retinoblastoma.
    Choi YJ; Park C; Jin HC; Choung HK; Lee MJ; Kim N; Khwarg SI; Yu YS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1530-3. PubMed ID: 24064935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design of a magnetically integrated microporous implant.
    Murray TG; Cicciarelli NL; Croft BH; Garonzik S; Voigt M; Hernandez E
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Sep; 118(9):1259-62. PubMed ID: 10980772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial eye amplitudes and characteristics in enucleated socket with porous polyethylene spherical and quad-motility implant.
    Lucci LM; Höfling-Lima AL; Erwenne CM; Toledo Cassano EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 18157310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An infected porous polyethylene orbital implant.
    Jordan DR; Brownstein S; Rawlings N; Robinson J
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(5):413-5. PubMed ID: 17881998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motility assessment and clinical outcomes of a magnetically integrated microporous implant.
    Miller DM; Murray T; Suarez F; Cicciarelli NL; Swords GG
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2007; 38(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 17674929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Craniofacial augmentation with porous polyethylene implants (Medpor: first clinical results].
    Gosau M; Schiel S; Draenert GF; Ihrler S; Mast G; Ehrenfeld M
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2006 May; 10(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 16685567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients.
    Tabatabaee Z; Mazloumi M; Rajabi MT; Khalilzadeh O; Kassaee A; Moghimi S; Eftekhar H; Goldberg RA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 20829725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.