These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1035591)

  • 21. The medical community looks at review.
    Murchison GC
    Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 4073392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A retrospective and concurrent medical audit.
    Knowlton HC
    Hosp Prog; 1975 Jun; 56(6):68, 73, 76 passim. PubMed ID: 1168621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Editorial: Enough.
    Kuykendall HC
    Va Med Mon (1918); 1974 Sep; 101(9):715-7. PubMed ID: 4472080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Aspects of audit. 4: Acceptability of audit.
    Shaw CD
    Br Med J; 1980 Jun; 280(6229):1443-6. PubMed ID: 7191748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confidentiality: do physicians have a right to privacy?
    Nelson AR
    Internist; 1978 Mar; 19(2):16-7, 22. PubMed ID: 10306827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PSRO-an opposing view.
    Johnson JW
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1974 May; 63(5):185-71. PubMed ID: 4856995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Peer review and you.
    Rhyne RH
    J Med Assoc State Ala; 1973 May; 42(11):767-8. PubMed ID: 4735406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hospitals coping with the shadow of peer review.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):22-4, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10296739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New Jersey's case for local control of the Medicare review process.
    Kingsley DI; Rodi A
    N J Med; 1992 Jul; 89(7):527-8. PubMed ID: 1305270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peer review organizations. Practical steps in dealing with them.
    Shook MB
    Consultant; 1988 Aug; 28(8):72-4, 76-7. PubMed ID: 10302669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer review: current law and policy problems.
    Hyman DA
    Healthspan; 1991; 8(7):3-10. PubMed ID: 10114029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PSRO--Professional Standards. Review Organization.
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1973 Oct; 66(10):977-92. PubMed ID: 4796022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Qualidigm evaluates Medicaid managed care health plan performance.
    Bell J; Casey B; Waite B
    Conn Med; 1999 Jun; 63(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 10432768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Professional review and regulations.
    George JE; Quattrone MS; Phillips J
    N J Med; 1990 Dec; 87(12):983-6. PubMed ID: 2270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs). II. Developing professional standards review in dietetics.
    Hansen SG
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1974 Dec; 65(6):656-8. PubMed ID: 4475054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. AAPS suit challenges PSRO law.
    Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1973 Aug; 52(8):298-9. PubMed ID: 4738623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Editorial: The chronic defensive syndrome.
    Gray ED
    J Kans Med Soc; 1974 May; 75(5):185-6. PubMed ID: 4856994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assurance in health care--the federal government: PSRO.
    Munier WB
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1974 Jul; 31(7):660-3. PubMed ID: 4605000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.