These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1035591)

  • 41. Practitioners speak out on PSRO.
    Patient Care; 1979 Mar; 13(5):241, 244-5. PubMed ID: 10273129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Providers warm up to payer-based EHRs.
    Med Health; 2006 May; 60(17):2-3. PubMed ID: 16686076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Antitrust's recent attack on the peer review practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy?
    Rifkin AM; Evans GE; Hall GD
    Md Med J; 1990 Jan; 39(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 2308484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. EMCRO: the hospital.
    Foster LA; Wells SB
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1973 Aug; 62(8):284-6. PubMed ID: 4737865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. PSRO.
    Ariz Med; 1974 Jan; 31(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 4855857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Editorial: Peer review.
    Calif Med; 1970 Aug; 113(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 5527886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. PSRO's and pharmacy.
    DeMarco CT
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1973 Aug; 30(8):723-5. PubMed ID: 4737358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Administrative reviews: manpower and education.
    Mitchell M
    Hospitals; 1975 Apr; 49(7):69-71. PubMed ID: 1090509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is there a foundation in your future?
    Farrington JF
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1973 Jun; 66(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 4737000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. PSRO or nothing?
    Manry WE
    JFMA; 1973 Jul; 60(7):88-90. PubMed ID: 4736606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Toward effective quality assurance: the evolution and current status of the JCAH QA standard.
    Roberts JS; Walczak RM
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 Jan; 10(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 6422378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. PSRO and Peer Review: can we live with them?
    Cocco AE
    Md State Med J; 1975 Mar; 24(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 1092025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Editorial: On cookbooks and laundry lists.
    Schorr TM
    Am J Nurs; 1974 Oct; 74(10):1805. PubMed ID: 4496768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The state of the art of quality assessment--1973.
    Lewis CE
    Med Care; 1974 Oct; 12(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 4474575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Malpractice liability and PSRO. Part I.
    Cowles JM
    Hosp Admin Curr; 1975 Dec; 19(8):1-4. PubMed ID: 10273066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Road to PRO contract fraught with twists and turns.
    Eberly AL
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Sep; 80(9):591-2. PubMed ID: 8228893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Communication as the key to effective joint practice audit.
    Johnson A
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1976 Dec; 2(12):6-8. PubMed ID: 827727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. PRO proposal jeopardizes confidentiality.
    Am Med News; 1984 Jul; 27(27):4. PubMed ID: 11653592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Evaluation of quality of care in the United States].
    Durand-Zaleski I; Audet AM; Greenfield S; Jolly D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1991; 39(5):467-76. PubMed ID: 1775700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.