These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10356466)

  • 21. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip.
    Booth JR; Scheetz JP; Lemons JE; Eleazer PD
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12540222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile.
    Berutti E; Chiandussi G; Gaviglio I; Ibba A
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 12540212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment.
    Di Fiore PM; Genov KA; Komaroff E; Li Y; Lin L
    Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 16916359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments in management of curved root canals].
    Xu Q; Fan B; Fan MW; Bian Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 15061889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cleaning efficiency of nickel-titanium GT and .04 rotary files when used in a torque-controlled rotary handpiece.
    Suffridge CB; Hartwell GR; Walker TL
    J Endod; 2003 May; 29(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 12775008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vertical force and torque analysis during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using hand ProTaper instruments.
    Glavičić S; Anić I; Braut A; Miletić I; Borčić J
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):51-5. PubMed ID: 21771182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists.
    Parashos P; Messer HH
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 15056351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of the endogrammes developed during obturations on extracted teeth using system B.
    Blum JY; Cathala C; Machtou P; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2001 Nov; 27(11):661-5. PubMed ID: 11716076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Torsional fatigue and endurance limit of a size 30.06 ProFile rotary instrument.
    Best S; Watson P; Pilliar R; Kulkarni GG; Yared G
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jun; 37(6):370-3. PubMed ID: 15186243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of simulated clinical use on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Bahia MG; Melo MC; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 16632283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections.
    Xu X; Eng M; Zheng Y; Eng D
    J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):372-5. PubMed ID: 16554216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices.
    Shen Y; Coil JM; McLean AG; Hemerling DL; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1363-7. PubMed ID: 19801231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use.
    Shen Y; Cheung GS; Bian Z; Peng B
    J Endod; 2006 Jan; 32(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 16410072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of deep dry cryogenic treatment on cutting efficiency and wear resistance of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Vinothkumar TS; Miglani R; Lakshminarayananan L
    J Endod; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1355-8. PubMed ID: 17963963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 3: a 4-year retrospective study from an undergraduate clinic.
    Shen Y; Coil JM; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 19166771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.