These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10356553)

  • 1. Dental implant materials: commercially pure titanium and titanium alloys.
    McCracken M
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Mar; 8(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 10356553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Base metal alloys used for dental restorations and implants.
    Roach M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 51(3):603-27, vi. PubMed ID: 17586146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical characteristics of various tempers of as-received cobalt-chromium archwires.
    Kusy RP; Mims L; Whitley JQ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):274-91. PubMed ID: 11244422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between vertical misfits and stresses over implants from castable frameworks made of different alloys.
    Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; de França DG; das Neves FD; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2062-5. PubMed ID: 25329843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical note no. 11. Mechanical properties in bending of shape-memory wires.
    Lipshatz J; Brockhurst PJ; West VC
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Aug; 37(4):315-6. PubMed ID: 1444950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of corrosion between a titanium implant and dental alloys.
    Reclaru L; Meyer JM
    J Dent; 1994 Jun; 22(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 8027459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study.
    Juvvadi SR; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Chitharanjan AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 21055604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
    Prososki RR; Bagby MD; Erickson LC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 1927985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study on microgap of premade abutments and abutments cast in base metal alloys.
    Lalithamma JJ; Mallan SA; Murukan PA; Zarina R
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 24914909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry.
    Thompson SA
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 11307203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.
    Brown RN; Sexton BE; Gabriel Chu TM; Katona TR; Stewart KT; Kyung HM; Liu SS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 24703288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Currently used orthodontic alloys. Review (1)].
    Kapila S; Sakima T; Miyazaki S; Sachdeva R
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(4):334-42. PubMed ID: 2135450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
    Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires.
    Verstrynge A; Van Humbeeck J; Willems G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):460-70. PubMed ID: 17045145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of the abrasive resistance of metal alloys with applications in dental prosthetic fixators.
    Gil FJ; Fernández E; Manero JM; Planell JA; Sabrià J; Cortada M; Giner L
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1995; 5(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 8555966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial denture clasps.
    Bridgeman JT; Marker VA; Hummel SK; Benson BW; Pace LL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Aug; 78(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 9260137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires--an in vitro study.
    Vijayalakshmi RD; Nagachandran KS; Kummi P; Jayakumar P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20139569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress Over Implants of One-Piece Cast Frameworks Made With Different Materials.
    Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; de França DG; das Neves FD; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):238-41. PubMed ID: 26674889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.