238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10356949)
1. [Evaluation of two root canal preparation and obturation methods: the Mc Spadden method and the use of ProFile-Thermafil].
Rapisarda E; Bonaccorso A; Tripi TR
Minerva Stomatol; 1999; 48(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 10356949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.
Gordon MP; Love RM; Chandler NP
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15667630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sealer area associated with cold lateral condensation of gutta-percha and warm coated carrier filling systems in canals prepared with various rotary NiTi systems.
Gulsahi K; Cehreli ZC; Kuraner T; Dagli FT
Int Endod J; 2007 Apr; 40(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 17309742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of Profile .04 taper series 29 in removing filling materials during root canal retreatment--an in vitro study.
Betti LV; Bramante CM; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19717318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Homogeneity and adaptation of endodontic fillings in root canals with enlarged apical preparation.
ElAyouti A; Kiefner P; Hecker H; Chu A; Löst C; Weiger R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):e141-6. PubMed ID: 19576806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of the ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment.
Valois CR; Navarro M; Ramos AA; de Castro AJ; Gahyva SM
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11450685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Studies comparing the efficacy of root canal filling with gutta-percha lateral condensation and Thermafil obturators].
Lipski M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2000; 46():317-30. PubMed ID: 11712315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of removal times of Thermafil plastic obturators using ProFile rotary instruments at different rotational speeds in moderately curved canals.
Royzenblat A; Goodell GG
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 17320708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment.
Masiero AV; Barletta FB
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 15606816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of different gutta-percha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities.
Gencoglu N; Yildirim T; Garip Y; Karagenc B; Yilmaz H
Int Endod J; 2008 Oct; 41(10):836-42. PubMed ID: 18822011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area obtained by Thermafil and System B.
De-Deus G; Maniglia-Ferreira CM; Gurgel-Filho ED; Paciornik S; Machado AC; Coutinho-Filho T
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17697245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A laboratory analysis of gutta-percha-filled area obtained using Thermafil, System B and lateral condensation.
De-Deus G; Gurgel-Filho ED; Magalhães KM; Coutinho-Filho T
Int Endod J; 2006 May; 39(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 16640636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials.
Somma F; Cammarota G; Plotino G; Grande NM; Pameijer CH
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 18358899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of vertical forces during root canal filling with three different obturation techniques.
Katalinić I; Baraba A; Glavicić S; Segović S; Anić I; Miletić I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Sep; 37(3):895-9. PubMed ID: 24308234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer.
Kosti E; Lambrianidis T; Economides N; Neofitou C
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 16409328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Aydin B; Köse T; Calişkan MK
Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19825041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of apical filling after root canal filling by 2 different techniques.
Tasdemir T; Yesilyurt C; Ceyhanli KT; Celik D; Er K
J Can Dent Assoc; 2009 Apr; 75(3):201a-201d. PubMed ID: 19356318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
