These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10356969)

  • 1. Measuring the perceptual magnet effect in the perception of /i/ by German listeners.
    Diesch E; Iverson P; Kettermann A; Siebert C
    Psychol Res; 1999; 62(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 10356969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/.
    Iverson P; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 8609297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not.
    Kuhl PK
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Aug; 50(2):93-107. PubMed ID: 1945741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.
    Iverson P; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):553-62. PubMed ID: 7860832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further tests of the "perceptual magnet effect" in the perception of [i]: identification and change/no-change discrimination.
    Sussman JE; Lauckner-Morano VJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):539-52. PubMed ID: 7860831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts.
    Polka L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1286-96. PubMed ID: 7876448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetic category structure of [I]: extent, best exemplars, and organization.
    Sussman JE; Gekas B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1406-24. PubMed ID: 9430760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depolarizing the perceptual magnet effect.
    Lotto AJ; Kluender KR; Holt LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3648-55. PubMed ID: 9637046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On prototypes and phonetic categories: a critical assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech perception.
    Lively SE; Pisoni DB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1665-79. PubMed ID: 9425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual magnet and phoneme boundary effects in speech perception: do they arise from a common mechanism?
    Iverson P; Kuhl PK
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 May; 62(4):874-86. PubMed ID: 10883591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The perceptual magnet effect in Australian English vowels.
    Thyer N; Hickson L; Dodd B
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jan; 62(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10703252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Within-category discrimination of musical chords: perceptual magnet or anchor?
    Acker BE; Pastore RE; Hall MD
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Aug; 57(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 7651810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: a multidimensional scaling analysis.
    Fox RA; Flege JE; Munro MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2540-51. PubMed ID: 7714272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception/production relationships in the development of the vowel duration cue to final consonant voicing.
    Lehman ME; Sharf DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):803-15. PubMed ID: 2601311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of local speaking rate context on the perception of voice-onset time in initial stop consonants.
    Utman JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Mar; 103(3):1640-53. PubMed ID: 9514028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants.
    Polka L; Bohn OS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):577-92. PubMed ID: 8675849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the structure of phoneme categories in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Lane H; Denny M; Guenther FH; Hanson HM; Marrone N; Matthies ML; Perkell JS; Stockmann E; Tiede M; Vick J; Zandipour M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 17344544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.
    Miller JL; Volaitis LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 2587179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shifting Perceptual Weights in L2 Vowel Identification after Training.
    Hu W; Mi L; Yang Z; Tao S; Li M; Wang W; Dong Q; Liu C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162876. PubMed ID: 27649413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.