These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10356971)

  • 1. Mental rotation, memory scanning, and the central bottleneck.
    Heil M; Wahl K; Herbst M
    Psychol Res; 1999; 62(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 10356971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does mental rotation require central mechanisms?
    Ruthruff E; Miller J; Lachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):552-70. PubMed ID: 7790833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Common processing constraints for visuomotor and visual mental rotations.
    Pellizzer G; Georgopoulos AP
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 93(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 8467886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck?
    Van Selst M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Aug; 20(4):905-21. PubMed ID: 8083643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?
    Ruthruff E; Pashler HE; Hazeltine E
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):801-16. PubMed ID: 12956587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
    Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective effect of closed-head injury on central resource allocation: evidence from dual-task performance.
    Dell'Acqua R; Stablum F; Galbiati S; Spannocchi G; Cerri C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(3):364-78. PubMed ID: 11243478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Operation compatibility: a neglected contribution to dual-task costs.
    Pannebakker MM; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):447-60. PubMed ID: 19331500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms.
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1023-40. PubMed ID: 1837295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.
    Strobach T; Schütz A; Schubert T
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():403. PubMed ID: 25904890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 12669744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion.
    Navon D; Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 May; 44(3):193-251. PubMed ID: 11971632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.