BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10357289)

  • 1. Prostate cancer treatment and ten-year survival among group/staff HMO and fee-for-service Medicare patients.
    Potosky AL; Merrill RM; Riley GF; Taplin SH; Barlow W; Fireman BH; Lubitz JD
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Jun; 34(2):525-46. PubMed ID: 10357289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate cancer outcomes among older men: insurance status comparisons results from CaPSURE database.
    Sadetsky N; Elkin EP; Latini DM; DuChane J; Carroll PR;
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 17893700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of cancer diagnosis and treatment in Medicare fee-for-service and managed care plans.
    Riley GF; Warren JL; Potosky AL; Klabunde CN; Harlan LC; Osswald MB
    Med Care; 2008 Oct; 46(10):1108-15. PubMed ID: 18815533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing mortality and time until death for medicare HMO and FFS beneficiaries.
    Maciejewski ML; Dowd B; Call KT; Feldman R
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Feb; 35(6):1245-65. PubMed ID: 11221818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association of Medicare health care delivery systems with stage at diagnosis and survival for patients with melanoma.
    Kirsner RS; Wilkinson JD; Ma F; Pacheco H; Federman DG
    Arch Dermatol; 2005 Jun; 141(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 15967922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of mortality and intermediate outcomes between medicare dialysis patients in HMO and fee for service.
    Eggers PW; Frankenfield DL; Greer JW; McClellan W; Owen WF; Rocco MV
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Apr; 39(4):796-804. PubMed ID: 11920346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of functional outcomes after hip fracture in group/staff HMOs and fee-for-service systems.
    Coleman EA; Kramer AM; Kowalsky JC; Eckhoff D; Lin M; Hester EJ; Morgenstern N; Steiner JF
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):229-39. PubMed ID: 11185328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insurance and quality of life in men with prostate cancer: data from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor.
    Sadetsky N; Lubeck DP; Pasta DJ; Latini DM; DuChane J; Carroll PR
    BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 18291018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Medicare fee-for-service and a group-model HMO in the inpatient management and long-term survival of elderly individuals with syncope.
    Getchell WS; Larsen GC; Morris CD; McAnulty JH
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Oct; 6(10):1089-98. PubMed ID: 11184665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival and treatment for colorectal cancer Medicare patients in two group/staff health maintenance organizations and the fee-for-service setting.
    Merrill RM; Brown ML; Potosky AL; Riley G; Taplin SH; Barlow W; Fireman BH
    Med Care Res Rev; 1999 Jun; 56(2):177-96. PubMed ID: 10373723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of medicare health care delivery systems on survival for patients with breast and colorectal cancer.
    Kirsner RS; Ma F; Fleming L; Federman DG; Trapido E; Duncan R; Wilkinson JD
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Apr; 15(4):769-73. PubMed ID: 16614122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of a change in Medicare reimbursement policy and HEDIS measures on stage at diagnosis among Medicare HMO and fee-for-service female breast cancer patients.
    Habermann EB; Virnig BA; Riley GF; Baxter NN
    Med Care; 2007 Aug; 45(8):761-6. PubMed ID: 17667310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicare HMOs: who joins and who leaves?
    Virnig BA; Morgan RO; DeVito CA; Persily NA
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Apr; 4(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 10179910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enrollee health status under Medicare risk contracts: an analysis of mortality rates.
    Riley G; Lubitz J; Rabey E
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Jun; 26(2):137-63. PubMed ID: 2061054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of medicare health maintenance organizations on hospitalization rates for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.
    Zeng F; O'Leary JF; Sloss EM; Lopez MS; Dhanani N; Melnick G
    Med Care; 2006 Oct; 44(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 17001260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer survival and treatment in health maintenance organization and fee-for-service settings.
    Potosky AL; Merrill RM; Riley GF; Taplin SH; Barlow W; Fireman BH; Ballard-Barbash R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Nov; 89(22):1683-91. PubMed ID: 9390537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Medicare-HMO revolving door--the healthy go in and the sick go out.
    Morgan RO; Virnig BA; DeVito CA; Persily NA
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Jul; 337(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 9219704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicare HMO impact on utilization at the end of life.
    Fonkych K; O'Leary JF; Melnick GA; Keeler EB
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Aug; 14(8):505-12. PubMed ID: 18690766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns among older women with breast cancer: an HMO and fee-for-service comparison.
    Riley GF; Potosky AL; Klabunde CN; Warren JL; Ballard-Barbash R
    JAMA; 1999 Feb; 281(8):720-6. PubMed ID: 10052442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care.
    Retchin SM; Brown RS; Yeh SC; Chu D; Moreno L
    JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 9214526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.