115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10357400)
21. [DNA flow cytometry: perspective prognostic parameters in carcinoma of the uterine cervix].
Anton M; Nenutil R; Kopecný J; Rejthar A; Zaloudík J; Hausner P; Ptácková B
Cesk Gynekol; 1992 Apr; 57(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 1628337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [DNA stemline heterogeneity as preoperative prognostic factor in esophageal cancer].
Etoh K; Kaketani K; Saito T; Uchino S; Shimoda K; Miyahara M; Kobayashi M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 May; 21 Suppl 1():1-5. PubMed ID: 8203920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comprehensive characterization of annexin I alterations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hu N; Flaig MJ; Su H; Shou JZ; Roth MJ; Li WJ; Wang C; Goldstein AM; Li G; Emmert-Buck MR; Taylor PR
Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Sep; 10(18 Pt 1):6013-22. PubMed ID: 15447985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Flow cytometric DNA content analysis on squamous cell carcinomas according to the preceding lesions.
Tamura A; Ohnishi K; Ishikawa O; Miyachi Y
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Jan; 134(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 8745884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Goan YG; Chang HC; Hsu HK; Chou YP
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 31(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 17222561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Prognostic significance of DNA content measured by flow cytometry in supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma].
Morales Angulo C; Fernández Fernández F; Val Bernal F; Buelta L; García-Castrillo L; Rama Quintela J
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1997; 48(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 9471196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Penile cancer: flow cytometry study of ploidies in 90 patients].
Ornellas AA; Mendes Campos M; Ornellas MH; Wisnescky A; Koifman N; Cabral Harab R
Prog Urol; 2000 Feb; 10(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 10785922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic value of static cytometry in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: recurrence rate and survival in a group of patients at 10 years follow-up.
Cai T; Margallo E; Nesi G; Giubilei G; Rizzo M; Bartoletti R
Oncol Rep; 2006 Jan; 15(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 16328058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Problems in DNA ploidy analysis using flow cytometry--influences from contaminant mononuclear cells].
Yasuda N; Fukushima T; Saito Y; Nakai S; Murakami Y; Matsumoto H
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1993 Apr; 20(6):726-30. PubMed ID: 8489275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DNA analysis of laryngeal carcinoma cells by flow cytometry: the histoclinical factors and their significance.
Dobroś W; Lackowska B; Ryś J; Niezabitowski A; Stanisz-Wallis K; Olszewski E; Modrzejewski M
J Otolaryngol; 2000 Dec; 29(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 11770146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Correlation of DNA ploidy in fresh tumor tissues to prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Han F; Wang HY; Xia YF; Liu MZ; Zhao C; Lu TX
Ai Zheng; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1015-9. PubMed ID: 17927864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction in ovarian cancer determined by flow cytometry following detection of cytokeratin-labeled tumor cells.
Kimmig R; Wimberger P; Hillemanns P; Kapsner T; Caspari C; Hepp H
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Jan; 84(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 11748971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ampullary carcinoma: prognostic significance of ploidy, cell-cycle analysis and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA).
Crucitti A; Masetti R; Breccia C; Coppola R; Magistrelli P; Nuzzo G; Maggiano N; Picciocchi A
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(26):1187-91. PubMed ID: 10370689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stemline heterogeneity of nuclear DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Iwao Y; Kim YI; Kaketani K; Nakashima K; Okada K; Kobayashi M
Hepatogastroenterology; 1993 Oct; 40(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 8270242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 8, 9, 11, and 17 in squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx: a fluorescence in situ hybridization and DNA flow cytometric analysis of 50 cases.
Hardisson D; Alvarez-Marcos C; Salas-Bustamante A; Alonso-Guervós M; Sastre N; Sampedro A
Oral Oncol; 2004 Apr; 40(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 14969820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlation between DNA ploidy by flow cytometry and chromosome 3 aberration in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Hemmer J; Kraft K; Van Heerden WF
Oncol Rep; 2006 Jan; 15(1):243-6. PubMed ID: 16328063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Iraqi patients.
Garib BT; Al-Ani S; Al-Alwan N; Tillawi IS
East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(2-3):393-403. PubMed ID: 15339129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Analysis of malignant potential on colorectal carcinoma utilizing expression of epidermal growth factor and DNA ploidy patterns].
Yamada H; Kurooka K; Funai S; Fujii Y; Imanishi Y; Sato S; Watatani M; Shindo K; Yasutomi M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Jun; 22 Suppl 2():186-91. PubMed ID: 7611788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. DNA ploidy in human esophageal squamous dysplasias and squamous cell carcinomas as determined by image analysis.
Itakura Y; Sasano H; Mori S; Nagura H
Mod Pathol; 1994 Oct; 7(8):867-73. PubMed ID: 7838841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Usefulness of cytofluorometric DNA ploidy analysis in distinguishing benign cartilaginous tumors from chondrosarcomas.
Kusuzaki K; Murata H; Takeshita H; Hirata M; Hashiguchi S; Tsuji Y; Nakamura S; Ashihara T; Hirasawa Y
Mod Pathol; 1999 Sep; 12(9):863-72. PubMed ID: 10496594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
