These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1035783)
61. A report on the National Professional Standards Review Council Meeting, September 22-23, 1975, Washington, DC. Med Rec News; 1975 Dec; 46(6):77-9. PubMed ID: 10318411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Institutional animal care and use committees. Britt DP ATLA Abstr; 1986 Mar; 13(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 11649839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department. McGarvey MR Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Report of the National Professional Standards Review Council Meeting, July 21-22, 1975, Washington, DC. Med Rec News; 1975 Oct; 46(5):72-4. PubMed ID: 10318410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Is high-quality care assessable? McKillop W Hospitals; 1975 Jan; 49(2):43-7. PubMed ID: 1167326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. PSRO: the federal perspective. Munier WB Hosp Formul; 1975 Jun; 10(6):279-82. PubMed ID: 10273080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. PROs make us waste time and money. Gambrell TR Med Econ; 1992 Jun; 69(12):29, 32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10118826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs). Winterfeldt E J Am Diet Assoc; 1974 Dec; 65(6):654-6. PubMed ID: 4475053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Professional Standards Review Organization studies length of stay for cataract extraction in District of Columbia hospitals. Zimmerman MH; Schlein P; Fuller NA; Carrier E Public Health Rep; 1981; 96(5):439-41. PubMed ID: 7197378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers. Siegel SH Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. KePRO prepares for new national cooperative project. Harrop DE Pa Med; 1995 Nov; 98(11):28. PubMed ID: 7501413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Proceedings: Utilization review, medical audit, and peer review. Scott JC J Reprod Med; 1974 Feb; 12(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 4855852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The strategy of evaluating nationwide MCE impact. Adler GS; Dobson A QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Oct; 5(10):8-11. PubMed ID: 121387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Williamson JW N Engl J Med; 1973 Jun; 288(25):1352-3. PubMed ID: 4735895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]