145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10358390)
1. Magnetic resonance assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts.
Molinari G; Sardanelli F; Zandrino F; Balzan C; Masperone MA
Rays; 1999; 24(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 10358390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging.
Stauder NI; Fenchel M; Stauder H; Küttner A; Scheule AM; Kramer U; Claussen CD; Miller S
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 15746745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for control of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass conduits (MIDCAB/OPCAB).
Boehm DH; Wintersperger BJ; Reichenspurner H; Gulbins H; Detter C; Kur F; Meiser B; Reichart B
Heart Surg Forum; 1999; 2(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 11276479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency using three-dimensional angiography obtained with contrast-enhanced electron beam CT.
Ha JW; Cho SY; Shim WH; Chung N; Jang Y; Lee HM; Choe KO; Chung WJ; Choi SH; Yoo KJ; Kang MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1055-9. PubMed ID: 10587146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of electron-beam tomography in the evaluation of the patency of aortocoronary bypasses].
Knez A; Haberl R; Becker C; Becker A; Engelmann M; Brüning R; Reiser M; Steinbeck G
Radiologe; 1998 Dec; 38(12):1012-20. PubMed ID: 9931976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Magnetic resonance with the spin-echo technic in the noninvasive evaluation of the patency of aortocoronary bypasses: preliminary data].
Knoll P; Bonatti G; Pitscheider W; Psenner K; Erlicher A; Crepaz R; Zammarchi A; Gostner P; Braito E
G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 23(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 8325459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. An angiographically controlled study.
Galjee MA; van Rossum AC; Doesburg T; van Eenige MJ; Visser CA
Circulation; 1996 Feb; 93(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 8640993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency with tomodensitometry and exercise myocardial scintigraphy].
Usdin JP; Vasile N; Cinotti L; Meignan M; Legendre T; Larde P; Szwarc G; Vernant P
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1983 Feb; 76(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 6407426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The value of ultrafast computerized tomography in detection of the patency of coronary bypasses].
Knez A; von Smekal A; Haberl R; Spiegl F; Reichart B; Reiser M; Steinbeck G
Z Kardiol; 1996 Sep; 85(9):629-34. PubMed ID: 8992804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in evaluating the patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts].
Knoll P; Bonatti G; Pitscheider W; Psenner K; Erlicher A; Zammarchi A; Crepaz R
Z Kardiol; 1994 Jun; 83(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 8067046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts: a validation study with Doppler flow measurements.
Langerak SE; Kunz P; Vliegen HW; Jukema JW; Zwinderman AH; Steendijk P; Lamb HJ; van der Wall EE; de Roos A
Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 11756716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging.
Langerak SE; Kunz P; de Roos A; Vliegen HW; van Der Wall EE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Sep; 10(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 10508306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noninvasive assessment of patients following aortocoronary bypass surgery.
Kostuk WJ; Deatrich D; Chamberlain MJ
Can J Surg; 1978 Mar; 21(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 305274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography and selective angiography for the detection of coronary bypass patency].
von Smekal A; Knez A; Seelos KC; Haberl R; Spiegl F; Reichart B; Steinbeck G; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Mar; 166(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9156587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography.
Manning WJ; Edelman RR
Magn Reson Q; 1993 Sep; 9(3):131-51. PubMed ID: 8398716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of phasic blood flow velocity characteristics of arterial and venous coronary artery bypass conduits.
Bach RG; Kern MJ; Donohue TJ; Aguirre FV; Caracciolo EA
Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II133-40. PubMed ID: 8222148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts -- an update].
Kreitner KF; Ehrhard K; Kunz RP; Abegunewardene N; Oberholzer K; Horstick G; Hake U; Mildenberger P; Thelen M
Rofo; 2004 Aug; 176(8):1079-88. PubMed ID: 15346282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Coronary arteries and coronary artery bypass in CT: options, limitations and perspectives].
Steiner P
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Sep; 5(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 7495888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging of coronary bypass grafts. comparison of the haste- and navigator techniques with conventional coronary angiography.
Wittlinger T; Voigtländer T; Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Thelen M; Meyer J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2002 Dec; 18(6):469-77; discussion 483-4. PubMed ID: 12537417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: can intraoperative physiologic imaging guide decision making?
Ferguson TB; Chen C; Babb JD; Efird JT; Daggubati R; Cahill JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 146(4):824-835.e1. PubMed ID: 23915918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
