These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10358693)

  • 1. Great expectations: historical perspectives on genetic breast cancer testing.
    Lerner BH
    Am J Public Health; 1999 Jun; 89(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 10358693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertain enthusiasm: the American Cancer Society, public education, and the problems of the movie, 1921-1960.
    Cantor D
    Bull Hist Med; 2007; 81(1):39-69. PubMed ID: 17369662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing to live: cancer education, movies, and the conversion narrative in America, 1921-1960.
    Cantor D
    Lit Med; 2009; 28(2):278-332. PubMed ID: 21141799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What did popular women's magazines from 1929 to 1949 say about breast cancer?
    Black ME
    Cancer Nurs; 1995 Aug; 18(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 7664254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening for Korean women must consider traditional risks as well as two genetic risk factors: genetic polymorphisms and inheritable gene mutations.
    Anderson G; Jun M; Choi K
    Cancer Nurs; 2007; 30(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 17510585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Architectures of genetic medicine: comparing genetic testing for breast cancer in the USA and the UK.
    Parthasarathy S
    Soc Stud Sci; 2005 Feb; 35(1):5-40. PubMed ID: 15991444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of education based on the health belief model on screening behavior in high risk women for breast cancer, Tehran, Iran.
    Hajian S; Vakilian K; Najabadi KM; Hosseini J; Mirzaei HR
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21517230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ["Screening" in special situations. Assessing predictive genetic screening for hereditary breast and colorectal cancer].
    Jonas S; Wild C; Schamberger C
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Feb; 97(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 12669692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.
    Bottorff JL; Ratner PA; Balneaves LG; Richardson CG; McCullum M; Hack T; Chalmers K; Buxton J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 11815405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer activism: past lessons, future directions.
    Lerner BH
    Nat Rev Cancer; 2002 Mar; 2(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 11990859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996.
    J Clin Oncol; 1996 May; 14(5):1730-6; discussion 1737-40. PubMed ID: 8622094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic counseling, testing, and screening for breast and ovarian cancer: practical and social considerations.
    Khabele D; Runowicz CD
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Jun; 2(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 12099190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's views on breast cancer risk and screening mammography: a qualitative interview study.
    Silverman E; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM; Byram SJ; Welch HG; Fischhoff B
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 11386630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitating informed decision making about breast cancer risk and genetic counseling among women calling the NCI's Cancer Information Service.
    Miller SM; Fleisher L; Roussi P; Buzaglo JS; Schnoll R; Slater E; Raysor S; Popa-Mabe M
    J Health Commun; 2005; 10 Suppl 1():119-36. PubMed ID: 16377604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudes, knowledge, risk perceptions and decision-making among women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and their spouses.
    Bluman LG; Rimer BK; Regan Sterba K; Lancaster J; Clark S; Borstelmann N; Iglehart JD; Winer EP
    Psychooncology; 2003; 12(5):410-27. PubMed ID: 12833555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.
    Wong XY; Chong KJ; van Til JA; Wee HL
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Nov; 17(1):776. PubMed ID: 29162038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing for breast cancer risk in our region of southeastern Georgia.
    MacNew HG; Rudolph R; Brower ST; Beck AN; Meister EA
    Breast J; 2010; 16(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 20030654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing--Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2004 Jul; 53(27):603-6. PubMed ID: 15254451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancer screening and risk-reducing behaviors of women seeking genetic cancer risk assessment for breast and ovarian cancers.
    MacDonald DJ; Sarna L; Uman GC; Grant M; Weitzel JN
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2006 Nov; 33(2):E27-35. PubMed ID: 16518435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.