These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10359240)

  • 1. Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs.
    Nechala P; Mahoney J; Farkas LG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Jun; 103(7):1819-25. PubMed ID: 10359240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.
    Wong JY; Oh AK; Ohta E; Hunt AT; Rogers GF; Mulliken JB; Deutsch CK
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18452351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
    Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of depth in eye distance measurements: comparison of single and stereo-photogrammetry.
    Douglas TS; Meintjes EM; Vaughan CL; Viljoen DL
    Am J Hum Biol; 2003; 15(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 12820199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Assessment of precision and accuracy of digital surface photogrammetry with the DSP 400 system].
    Krimmel M; Kluba S; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Mar; 50(3):45-53. PubMed ID: 15832575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate facial morphologic measurements using a 3-camera photogrammetric method.
    Deli R; Gioia ED; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Facial Anthropometry Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry and Direct Measuring Techniques.
    Düppe K; Becker M; Schönmeyr B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29608484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital 2D-photogrammetry and direct anthropometry--a comparing study on test accomplishment and measurement data.
    Franke-Gromberg C; Schüler G; Hermanussen M; Scheffler C
    Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 20954452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anthropometric Evaluation of Periorbital Region and Facial Projection Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry.
    Jodeh DS; Curtis H; Cray JJ; Ford J; Decker S; Rottgers SA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2017-2020. PubMed ID: 30277938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.
    Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse A; Grätz KW; Matthews F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 20485043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of cranial anthropometric measurement by traditional calipers to computed tomography and three-dimensional photogrammetry.
    Mendonca DA; Naidoo SD; Skolnick G; Skladman R; Woo AS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1106-10. PubMed ID: 23851749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized photogrammetry used to calculate the brow position index.
    Naif-de-Andrade NT; Hochman B; Naif-de-Andrade CZ; Ferreira LM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1047-51. PubMed ID: 22936380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precise measurement of cat patellofemoral joint surface geometry with multistation digital photogrammetry.
    Ronsky JL; Boyd SK; Lichti DD; Chapman MA; Salkauskas K
    J Biomech Eng; 1999 Apr; 121(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 10211454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method.
    Ozsoy U; Demirel BM; Yildirim FB; Tosun O; Sarikcioglu L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 19179087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive computerized scanning method for the correlation between the facial soft and hard tissues for an integrated three-dimensional anthropometry and cephalometry.
    Galantucci LM; Percoco G; Lavecchia F; Di Gioia E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 23714883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology.
    de Menezes M; Rosati R; Allievi C; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 19852596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics: a correlation study.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Puleo A; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 9456609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.