These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10360200)

  • 1. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Kreulen CM; Weerheijm KL; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Groen HJ; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):37-41, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10736656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation.
    Marks LA; Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE; Groen HJ; Martens LC
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 10460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children.
    Mass E; Gordon M; Fuks AB
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(2):93-7, 84. PubMed ID: 10431617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Pantaleon F; Kavvadia K
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results.
    Roeters JJ; Frankenmolen F; Burgersdijk RC; Peters TC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 9823078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M; Grobler SR; Senekal PJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results.
    Peters TC; Roeters JJ; Frankenmolen FW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9522693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
    Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.