117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10360564)
1. Genentech stands by original data.
Henner DJ; Goeddel DV; Heyneker H; Itakura K; Yansura D; Ross M; Miozzari G
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):297-8. PubMed ID: 10360564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Charges fly in $1bn hormone patent battle.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):289. PubMed ID: 10360558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. UC-Genentech trial.
Seeburg PH
Science; 1999 May; 284(5419):1465-6. PubMed ID: 10383323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Statement from Peter Seeburg.
Seeburg PH
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):298. PubMed ID: 10360565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genentech pays $200m over growth hormone 'theft'.
Dalton R; Schiermeier Q
Nature; 1999 Nov; 402(6760):335. PubMed ID: 10586857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. UC-Genentech trial.
Henner D; Goeddel DV; Heyneker H; Itakura K; Tansura D
Science; 1999 May; 284(5419):1465. PubMed ID: 10383322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. Researcher rebuked for 20-year-old misdeed.
Hagmann M
Science; 1999 Dec; 286(5448):2249-50. PubMed ID: 10636777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A sorry affair.
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):285. PubMed ID: 10360554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Affymetrix in new patents row.
Ledford H
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7203):377. PubMed ID: 18650873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nontraditional publications and their effect on patentable inventions.
Garabedian TE
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 11923849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US jury split over hormone patent case..
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):512. PubMed ID: 10376586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality patents.
Sinclair K
Australas Biotechnol; 1994; 4(5):284. PubMed ID: 7765675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Equivalents in biotechnology patents.
Auer HE
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 12610574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US acts to lengthen term of patents to help biotechnology.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 Aug; 400(6745):604. PubMed ID: 10458149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Need for a court to rule on patents and misconduct.
Bihain BE
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):875. PubMed ID: 12931157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biotechnology patents: strategies for meeting economic and ethical concerns.
Gold ER
Nat Genet; 2002 Apr; 30(4):359. PubMed ID: 11925560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymphokine racketeers? Cistron alleges foul play over IL-1, but Immunex sees it differently.
Hopp TP
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Mar; 14(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 9630886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Companies balk at California's patent rules for stem cell research.
Keim B
Nat Med; 2007 Jan; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 17206112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patenting biotechnology inventions in China.
Lui J
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 11135559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biotech patents and the inequitable conduct doctrine.
Michael A
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1219-21. PubMed ID: 17033655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
