BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10361195)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
    Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
    Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
    Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
    Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification.
    Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S
    Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Relationship between metastatic rate and amount of lymph nodes and prognosis of gastric cancer].
    Li K; Xu HM; Chen JQ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 85(30):2113-6. PubMed ID: 16313820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
    Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
    Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
    Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
    Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perigastric lymph node status as a prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer.
    Adachi Y; Suematsu T; Shiraishi N; Tanimura H; Morimoto A; Kitano S
    Br J Surg; 1998 Sep; 85(9):1281-4. PubMed ID: 9752878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma.
    Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y
    Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
    Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
    Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
    Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
    Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
    Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Metastasis rates of lymph nodes and distribution in advanced gastric cancer and its clinical significance].
    Nzengue JC; Zhan WH; Wang JP; Dong WG; Lan P; He YL; Chen ZX; Cai SR
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 9(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 17143796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of old and new TNM systems for nodal staging in adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction.
    de Manzoni G; Pedrazzani C; Verlato G; Roviello F; Pasini F; Pugliese R; Cordiano C
    Br J Surg; 2004 Mar; 91(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 14991629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Number versus distribution in classifying regional lymph node metastases from colon cancer.
    Hida J; Okuno K; Yasutomi M; Yoshifuji T; Matsuzaki T; Uchida T; Ishimaru E; Tokoro T; Shiozaki H
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Aug; 201(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 16038819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of five systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.
    Yu W; Choi GS; Whang I; Suh IS
    Br J Surg; 1997 Sep; 84(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 9313721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T3 gastric cancer.
    Hyung WJ; Noh SH; Yoo CH; Huh JH; Shin DW; Lah KH; Lee JH; Choi SH; Min JS
    World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 11865369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
    Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma].
    Zhan WH; Han FH; He YL; Li YM; Zheng ZQ; Peng JS; Cai SR; Ma JP
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16437364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.