147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10361656)
1. Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of sagittal insertion angle on intrapedicular bending moments.
Youssef JA; McKinley TO; Yerby SA; McLain RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(11):1077-81. PubMed ID: 10361656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of surgical technique on intravertebral and intrapedicular bending moments.
McKinley TO; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Sharkey NA; Sarigul-Klijn N; Smith TS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jan; 24(1):18-24, discussion 25. PubMed ID: 9921586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability. A synthetic model.
McLain RF; McKinley TO; Yerby SA; Smith TS; Sarigul-Klijn N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jul; 22(13):1454-60. PubMed ID: 9231963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of pedicle morphometry on pedicle screw loading. A synthetic model.
McKinley TO; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Sarigul-Klijn N; Smith TS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Feb; 22(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 9051885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loading of pedicle screws within the vertebra.
Yerby SA; Ehteshami JR; McLain RF
J Biomech; 1997 Sep; 30(9):951-4. PubMed ID: 9302618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different insertion points on the security of pedicle screw fixation in bovine vertebrae.
Al-Hadithi M; Hughes SP; Amis AA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 18197101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation. Biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation.
Chiba M; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA; Smith TS; Benson DR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 8742203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate: an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation.
Luk KD; Chen L; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 15738784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Residual stability of different interbody fusion techniques after pedicle screw loosening].
Diedrich O; Kraft CN; Lüring C; Perlick L; Pennekamp PH
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 15849637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.
Bostelmann R; Keiler A; Steiger HJ; Scholz A; Cornelius JF; Schmoelz W
Eur Spine J; 2017 Jan; 26(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 25813011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sacral screw loads in lumbosacral fixation for spinal deformity.
Pashman RS; Hu SS; Schendel MJ; Bradford DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Dec; 18(16):2465-70. PubMed ID: 8303450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees.
Kuklo TR; Lenke LG; O'Brien MF; Lehman RA; Polly DW; Schroeder TM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 15644761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Offset laminar hooks decrease bending moments of pedicle screws during in situ contouring.
Yerby SA; Ehteshami JR; McLain RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Feb; 22(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 9055363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures by short-segment pedicle screw fixation using a combination of two additional pedicle screws and vertebroplasty at the level of the fracture: a finite element analysis.
Liao JC; Chen WP; Wang H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jun; 18(1):262. PubMed ID: 28619021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
