These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10361842)

  • 1. Evaluating sex discrimination claims: the mediating role of attributions.
    Elkins TJ; Phillips JS
    J Appl Psychol; 1999 Apr; 84(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 10361842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender-related biases in evaluations of sex discrimination allegations: is perceived threat the key?
    Elkins TJ; Phillips JS; Konopaske R
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):280-92. PubMed ID: 12002956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination.
    Swim JK; Scott ED; Sechrist GB; Campbell B; Stangor C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 May; 84(5):944-59. PubMed ID: 12757140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting perceptions of date rape: an examination of perpetrator motivation, relationship length, and gender role beliefs.
    Angelone DJ; Mitchell D; Lucente L
    J Interpers Violence; 2012 Sep; 27(13):2582-602. PubMed ID: 22328651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's perceptions of gender discrimination.
    Spears Brown C; Bigler RS
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Sep; 40(5):714-26. PubMed ID: 15355161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: the role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments.
    Meiser T; Hewstone M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):599-614. PubMed ID: 15535774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity.
    Bodenhausen GV; Lichtenstein M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 May; 52(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 3585699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power effects on implicit prejudice and stereotyping: The role of intergroup face processing.
    Schmid PC; Amodio DM
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 12(2):218-231. PubMed ID: 26794726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame.
    Banaji MR; Greenwald AG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1995 Feb; 68(2):181-98. PubMed ID: 7877095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of hypnotically elicited testimony on jurors' judgments of guilt and innocence.
    Wagstaff GF; Vella M; Perfect T
    J Soc Psychol; 1992 Oct; 132(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 1453692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender stereotyping and decision processes: extending and reversing the gender bias in fame judgments.
    Buchner A; Steffens MC; Berry DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11009254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of victim gender and sexual orientation on judgments of the victim in a depicted stranger rape.
    Davies M; Pollard P; Archer J
    Violence Vict; 2001 Dec; 16(6):607-19. PubMed ID: 11863061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender-related therapist attributions in couples therapy: a preliminary multiple case study investigation.
    Stabb SD; Cox DL; Harber JL
    J Marital Fam Ther; 1997 Jul; 23(3):335-46. PubMed ID: 9373831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?
    Buchner A; Wippich W
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):197-220. PubMed ID: 8733931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self-presentation and need for control.
    Sechrist GB; Swim JK; Stangor C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jul; 87(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 15250796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The actor as context for social judgments: effects of prior impressions and stereotypes.
    Stewart TL; Doan KA; Gingrich BE; Smith ER
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Nov; 75(5):1132-54. PubMed ID: 9866181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does aging affect the use of shifting standards?
    Hoessler C; Chasteen AL
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18189164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
    Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.