These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10362175)

  • 1. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.
    Bailit JL; Dooley SL; Peaceman AN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 10362175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.
    Fantini MP; Stivanello E; Frammartino B; Barone AP; Fusco D; Dallolio L; Cacciari P; Perucci CA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Aug; 6():100. PubMed ID: 16911770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean delivery risk adjustment for regional interhospital comparisons.
    Glantz JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 181(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 10601924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.
    Li T; Rhoads GG; Smulian J; Demissie K; Wartenberg D; Kruse L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 12798526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills.
    Elliott JP; Russell MM; Dickason LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 177(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9240597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
    Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
    Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.
    Localio AR; Lawthers AG; Bengtson JM; Hebert LE; Weaver SL; Brennan TA; Landis JR
    JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 8418343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery.
    Joseph KS; Young DC; Dodds L; O'Connell CM; Allen VM; Chandra S; Allen AC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 14551010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information dissemination and the cesarean birth rate. The Illinois experience.
    Oleske DM; Glandon GL; Tancredi DJ; Nassirpour M; Noak JR
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1992; 8(4):708-18. PubMed ID: 1464490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.
    Burns LR; Geller SE; Wholey DR
    Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4):365-82. PubMed ID: 7731278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-adjusted measurement of primary cesarean sections: reliable assessment of the quality of obstetrical services.
    Pasternak DP; Pine M; Nolan K; French R
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10662103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician contribution to a cesarean delivery risk model.
    Luthy DA; Malmgren JA; Zingheim RW; Leininger CJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1579-85; discussion 1585-7. PubMed ID: 12824996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obstetrician volume as a potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery.
    Clapp MA; Melamed A; Robinson JN; Shah N; Little SE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 124(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 25198280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting goals for reductions in Canadian cesarean delivery rates: benchmarking medical practice patterns.
    Richman VV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):635-7. PubMed ID: 10486476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.