202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10363062)
1. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
Chakraborty DP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.
Penedo M; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Carreira JM; Villalón J; Porto G; Seoane C; Vidal JJ; Berbaum KS; Chakraborty DP; Fajardo LL
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):450-7. PubMed ID: 16244253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
Burgess AE
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.
Håkansson M; Svensson S; Zachrisson S; Svalkvist A; Båth M; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.
Chakraborty DP; Berbaum KS
Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2313-30. PubMed ID: 15377098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization and FROC analysis of rule-based detection schemes using a multiobjective approach.
Anastasio MA; Kupinski MA; Nishikawa RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Dec; 17(6):1089-93. PubMed ID: 10048867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
Edwards DC; Kupinski MA; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.
Chakraborty D; Yoon HJ; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17178361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
