202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10363062)
21. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
Chatburn RL
AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Perednia DA; Gaines JA; Butruille TW
Arch Dermatol; 1995 Mar; 131(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 7887658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
Song HH
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
Wunderlich A; Abbey CK
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):561-8. PubMed ID: 2770630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The value of observer performance studies in dose optimization: a focus on free-response receiver operating characteristic methods.
Thompson JD; Manning DJ; Hogg P
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Jun; 41(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 23625536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimation and comparison of CAD system performance in clinical settings.
Bornefalk H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 15935967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement].
Borasi G; Berardi P; Ferretti PP; Piccagli V
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 2236696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.
Swensson RG
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1709-25. PubMed ID: 8946368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Application of threshold-bias independent analysis to eye-tracking and FROC data.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1474-83. PubMed ID: 23040503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Criterion-free parameter-free distribution-independent index of diagnostic test performance.
Massof RW; Emmel TC
Appl Opt; 1987 Apr; 26(8):1395-408. PubMed ID: 20454334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Applying decision analysis in therapeutic drug monitoring: using receiver-operating characteristic curves in comparative evaluations.
Barr JT; Schumacher GE
Clin Pharm; 1986 Mar; 5(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 3514086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search.
Krupinski E; Roehrig H; Furukawa T
Acad Radiol; 1999 Jul; 6(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 10410166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of auditory-evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory.
Valdes-Sosa MJ; Bobes MA; Perez-Abalo MC; Perera M; Carballo JA; Valdes-Sosa P
Audiology; 1987; 26(3):166-78. PubMed ID: 3662940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [ROC: a method for comparing the diagnostic performance of imaging procedures].
Oestmann JW; Galanski M
Rofo; 1989 Jul; 151(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 2546219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA.
Tingberg A; Båth M; Håkansson M; Medin J; Besjakov J; Sandborg M; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):53-61. PubMed ID: 15933081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Use of ROC analysis in psychiatry].
Fombonne E; Fuhrer R
Encephale; 1992; 18(5):545-50. PubMed ID: 1340802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Wiener spectrum of radiographic systems: comparison of different evaluation methods.
Bregant P; De Denaro M; De Guarrini F; Borasi G
Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 9251741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Data analysis for detection and localization of multiple abnormalities with application to mammography.
Obuchowski NA; Lieber ML; Powell KA
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jul; 7(7):516-25. PubMed ID: 10902960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
