These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10363329)

  • 1. Exact and asymptotic tests for homogeneity in several 2 x 2 tables.
    Reis IM; Hirji KF; Afifi AA
    Stat Med; 1999 Apr; 18(8):893-906. PubMed ID: 10363329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo investigation of homogeneity tests of the odds ratio under various sample size configurations.
    Jones MP; O'Gorman TW; Lemke JH; Woolson RF
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 2720050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
    Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient power computation for exact and mid-P tests for the common odds ratio in several 2 x 2 tables.
    Hirji KF; Tang ML; Vollset SE; Elashoff RM
    Stat Med; 1994 Aug; 13(15):1539-49. PubMed ID: 7973232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Kang SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2524-35. PubMed ID: 17847031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical analysis of K 2 x 2 tables: a comparative study of estimators/test statistics for association and homogeneity.
    O'Gorman TW; Woolson RF; Jones MP; Lemke JH
    Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():103-7. PubMed ID: 2269213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small sample performance of tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in K 2 x 2 tables.
    Paul SR; Donner A
    Stat Med; 1992 Jan; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 1579755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simple polynomial multiplication algorithms for exact conditional tests of linearity in a logistic model.
    Tang ML; Hirji KF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2002 Jul; 69(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 12088589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing two independent incidence rates using conditional and unconditional exact tests.
    Han C
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17506083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test homogeneity of odds ratio in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):916-32. PubMed ID: 20183452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():49. PubMed ID: 26054650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of tests of contingency tables.
    Amiri S; Modarres R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):784-796. PubMed ID: 27936354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I; Álvarez Hernández M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():147038. PubMed ID: 26075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of Poisson frequency data under a simple crossover trial.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):385-99. PubMed ID: 22899697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
    Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorical independence tests for large sparse r-way contingency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):606-10. PubMed ID: 12434857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.