155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10365967)
1. Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening.
Smyth V; McPherson B; Kei J; Young J; Tudehope D; Maurer M; Rankin G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Apr; 48(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10365967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
Almenar Latorre A; Tapia Toca MC; Fernández Pérez C; Moro Serrano M
An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory screening in high-risk pre-term and full-term neonates using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and brainstem auditory evoked potentials.
Morlet T; Ferber-Viart C; Putet G; Sevin F; Duclaux R
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1998 Sep; 45(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 9804017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions hearing screening in high-risk newborns.
Salata JA; Jacobson JT; Strasnick B
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jan; 118(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9450826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A hospital based universal neonatal hearing screening programme using click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Sergi P; Pastorino G; Ravazzani P; Tognola G; Grandori F
Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):18-20. PubMed ID: 11318461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Newborn hearing screening using the evoked otoacoustic emission: The Philippine General Hospital experience.
Quintos MR; Isleta PF; Chiong CC; Abes GT
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():231-3. PubMed ID: 15906743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Vohr BR; Folsom RC; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Fletcher KA
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):425-42. PubMed ID: 11059702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Otoacoustic emission-based hearing screening of a Greek NICU population.
Apostolopoulos NK; Psarommatis IM; Tsakanikos MD; Dellagrammatikas HD; Douniadakis DE
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Jan; 47(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 10206393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of maturation on parameters used for pass/fail criteria in neonatal hearing screening programmes using evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Sadri M; Thornton AR; Kennedy CR
Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 17389789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Universal newborn hearing screening and transient evoked otoacoustic emission: new concepts in Brazil.
Chapchap MJ; Segre CM
Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (53):33-6. PubMed ID: 11409775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the number of averaged responses in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions on the results of neonatal hearing screening.
Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Economou C; Ferekidis E; Kandiloros D; Adamopoulos G
Audiology; 2000; 39(6):293-9. PubMed ID: 11766688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reflectance Measures from Infant Ears With Normal Hearing and Transient Conductive Hearing Loss.
Voss SE; Herrmann BS; Horton NJ; Amadei EA; Kujawa SG
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):560-71. PubMed ID: 27050773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
Tsui PW; McPherson B; Wong EC; Ng IH
Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards a universal newborn hearing screening.
Psarommatis IM; Tsakanikos MD; Diamantopoulou PM; Douniadakis DE; Apostolopoulos NK
Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):25-7. PubMed ID: 11318474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
Kezirian EJ; White KR; Yueh B; Sullivan SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neonatal hearing screening in a low-risk maternity in São Paulo state.
Kemp AA; Delecrode CR; Silva GC; Martins F; Frizzo AC; Cardoso AC
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 26277836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
