189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10366205)
21. Complication rate of venous access procedures performed by a radiology practitioner assistant compared with interventional radiology physicians and supervised trainees.
Benham JR; Culp WC; Wright LB; McCowan TC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Aug; 18(8):1001-4. PubMed ID: 17675618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study.
Dal Molin A; Rasero L; Guerretta L; Perfetti E; Clerico M
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 21167777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Central venous catheter placement by an interventional radiology unit: an Australian experience.
Lee MK; Mossop PJ; Vrazas JI
Australas Radiol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17217487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Experience with subcutaneous infusion ports in three hundred patients.
Brothers TE; Von Moll LK; Niederhuber JE; Roberts JA; Walker-Andrews S; Ensminger WD
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Apr; 166(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 3127896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experience with the intravenous totally implanted port in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Nelson BE; Mayer AR; Tseng PC; Schwartz PE
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 8175028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Rader JS; Farrell M; Awantang R; Herzog TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters.
Peynircioglu B; Ozkan F; Canyigit M; Cil BE; Balkanci F
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jul; 48(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 17611867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. US-guided placement of central vein catheters in patients with disorders of hemostasis.
Tercan F; Ozkan U; Oguzkurt L
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 17482407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of the right external jugular vein as the preferred access site when the right internal jugular vein is not usable.
Cho SK; Shin SW; Do YS; Park KB; Choo SW; Choo IW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 May; 17(5):823-9. PubMed ID: 16687748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiologic placement of tunneled central catheters: rates of success and of immediate complications in a large series.
Docktor BL; Sadler DJ; Gray RR; Saliken JC; So CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):457-60. PubMed ID: 10430153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effective supply use in permanent central venous catheter operations.
Howard TJ; Stines CP; O'Connor JA; Schuster WS; Wiebke EA
Am Surg; 1997 May; 63(5):441-5. PubMed ID: 9128234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Long term central venous catheterization revisited].
Palermo S; Campolucci A; Capozza F; Cammardella MP; Balestrero A; Ferrando F; Basta P; Launo C
Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):451-6. PubMed ID: 8677035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
Koonings PP; Given FT
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Long-term central venous access. Experience with 173 cases].
Valeri A; Borrelli A; Bontà M; Lucchese M; Tonelli P; Alessio F
Minerva Chir; 1999 Nov; 54(11):769-75. PubMed ID: 10638150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Image-guided central venous catheters for apheresis.
Sadler DJ; Gordon AC; Klassen J; Saliken JC; So CB; Gray RR
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 10197805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transhepatic central venous catheter for long-term access in paediatric patients.
Mortell A; Said H; Doodnath R; Walsh K; Corbally M
J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Feb; 43(2):344-7. PubMed ID: 18280287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percutaneous transfemoral repositioning of malpositioned central venous access device: a report of two cases.
Chauhan A; Pathak K; Ganguly M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 20479560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
