189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10366205)
41. [Insertion of Hickman catheters in an interventional radiology suite].
Konen E; Garniak A; Morag B; Hardan I; Rubinstein Z
Harefuah; 1997 Apr; 132(7):454-7, 528, 527. PubMed ID: 9153910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Peripheral infusion ports for central venous access in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cunningham MJ; Collins MB; Kredentser DC; Malfetano JH
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):397-9. PubMed ID: 8774645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
Jablon LK; Ugolini KR; Nahmias NC
Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16769277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude].
Krupski G; Fröschle GW; Weh FJ; Schlosser GA
Chirurg; 1995 Mar; 66(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 7750390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications).
Pittiruti M; Hamilton H; Biffi R; MacFie J; Pertkiewicz M;
Clin Nutr; 2009 Aug; 28(4):365-77. PubMed ID: 19464090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
D'Angelo FA; Ramacciato G; Aurello P; De Angelis R; Amodio P; Magrì M; Barillari P
Chir Ital; 2002; 54(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12239758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Medium- and long-term use of central venous catheters in pediatrics. Personal experience].
Orfei P; Pinto G; Properzi E; Piccardo A; Cerroni A; Prosperi M; Cozzi F
Minerva Anestesiol; 1996 Apr; 62(4):143-50. PubMed ID: 8984428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Placement of hemodialysis catheters through stenotic or occluded central thoracic veins.
Haller C; Déglise S; Saucy F; Mathieu C; Haesler E; Doenz F; Corpataux JM; Qanadli SD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jul; 32(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 19449059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Long-term results of radiologic placement of a central vein access device.
Beheshti MV; Protzer WR; Tomlinson TL; Martinek E; Baatz LA; Collins MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):731-4. PubMed ID: 9490964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of the femoral vein as insertion site for tunneled hemodialysis catheters.
Falk A
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 17327554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided implantation of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs)].
Gebauer B; Teichgräber UK; Podrabsky P; Beck A; Wagner HJ
Rofo; 2004 Mar; 176(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 15026952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Avoiding complications and decreasing costs of central venous catheter placement utilizing electrocardiographic guidance.
Francis KR; Picard DL; Fajardo MA; Pizzi WF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Sep; 175(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 1514154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Transhepatic Broviac catheter placement for long-term central venous access in critically ill children with complex congenital heart disease.
Qureshi AM; Rhodes JF; Appachi E; Mumtaz MA; Duncan BW; Asnes J; Radavansky P; Latson LA
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2007 May; 8(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 17417124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Implantable subcutaneous venous access devices: is port fixation necessary? A review of 534 cases.
McNulty NJ; Perrich KD; Silas AM; Linville RM; Forauer AR
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Aug; 33(4):751-5. PubMed ID: 19957181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Outpatient placement of subcutaneous venous access ports reduces the rate of infection and dehiscence compared with inpatient placement.
Pandey N; Chittams JL; Trerotola SO
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 23582442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison between peripherally implanted ports and externally sited catheters for long-term venous access.
Pullyblank AM; Carey PD; Pearce SZ; Tanner AG; Guillou PJ; Monson JR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jan; 76(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8117017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Experience with an implantable venous access system for chemotherapy.
Pettengell R; Davies AJ; Harvey VJ
N Z Med J; 1991 Jul; 104(915):284-5. PubMed ID: 1852329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Long-term central venous access in oncology. Review of a caseload of 750 cases].
Bertoglio S; Meszsaros P; Disomma C; Moresco L; Cafiero F; Gipponi M; Percivale P
Minerva Chir; 1996 Jun; 51(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 8992390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Sonographically guided venous puncture and fluoroscopically guided placement of tunneled, large-bore central venous catheters for bone marrow transplantation-high success rates and low complication rates.
Gebauer B; Teichgräber UM; Werk M; Beck A; Wagner HJ
Support Care Cancer; 2008 Aug; 16(8):897-904. PubMed ID: 18197436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
