BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10366205)

  • 61. Radiologic placement of Hickman catheters.
    Robertson LJ; Mauro MA; Jaques PF
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 2):1007-9. PubMed ID: 2916052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Peripherally-placed central venous access ports: clinical and laboratory observations.
    Johnson JA; Didlake RH
    Am Surg; 1994 Dec; 60(12):915-9. PubMed ID: 7992964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Interventional radiology and cross sectional imaging in venous access.
    Perry LJ; Sheiman RG; Hartnell GG
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1995 Jul; 4(3):505-35. PubMed ID: 7552791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Routine fluoroscopic guidance is not required for placement of Hickman catheters via the supraclavicular route.
    Apsner R; Schulenburg A; Sunder-Plassmann G; Muhm M; Keil F; Malzer R; Kalhs P; Druml W
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Jun; 21(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 9645579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Totally implantable central venous systems in neoplastic patients].
    Costantini R; Napolitano L; Scurti D; Innocenti P
    Ann Ital Chir; 1997; 68(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 9454549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Outcomes of surgical and radiologic placed implantable central venous access ports.
    Sticca RP; Dewing BD; Harris JD
    Am J Surg; 2009 Dec; 198(6):829-33. PubMed ID: 19969137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Chronic venous access: bedside placement technique and complications.
    Goldfarb PM; Coldwell D
    Cancer Pract; 1994; 2(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 7858655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Placement of central venous port catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in the routine clinical setting of a radiology department: analysis of costs and intervention duration learning curve.
    Rotzinger R; Gebauer B; Schnapauff D; Streitparth F; Wieners G; Grieser C; Freyhardt P; Hamm B; Maurer MH
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1468-1475. PubMed ID: 28406048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implantable venous access device insertion using interventional radiologic versus conventional operating room methods in pediatric patients with cancer.
    Hancock-Howard R; Connolly BL; McMahon M; Menon A; Woo G; Wales PW; Aziza A; Laporte A; Nauenberg E; Ungar WJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 May; 21(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 20347335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Percutaneous placement of Hickman catheters: comparison of sonographically guided and blind techniques.
    Laméris JS; Post PJ; Zonderland HM; Gerritsen PG; Kappers-Klunne MC; Schütte HE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Nov; 155(5):1097-9. PubMed ID: 2120941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Outpatient implantation of a central venous access system in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Shen-Gunther J; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Gold MA; Johnson GA
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Nov; 48(11):875-81. PubMed ID: 14686020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Insertion of totally implantable venous access devices: an expertise-based, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00600444).
    Knebel P; Lopez-Benitez R; Fischer L; Radeleff BA; Stampfl U; Bruckner T; Hennes R; Kieser M; Kauczor HU; Büchler MW; Seiler CM
    Ann Surg; 2011 Jun; 253(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 21412146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Tunneled central venous access catheter placement in the pediatric population: comparison of radiologic and surgical results.
    Nosher JL; Shami MM; Siegel RL; DeCandia M; Bodner LJ
    Radiology; 1994 Jul; 192(1):265-8. PubMed ID: 8208950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Long-term central venous access. Our experience].
    Siragusa G; Gelarda E; De Simone M; Epifanio E; Macaluso A
    Minerva Chir; 1998 Mar; 53(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9617115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Insertion of Hickman catheters by the percutaneous technique.
    Teh A; Leong KW
    Med J Malaysia; 1995 Dec; 50(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 8668056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Radiologic implantation of central venous portal systems in the forearm].
    Lenhart M; Chegini M; Gmeinwieser J; Manke C; Feuerbach S
    Rofo; 1998 Aug; 169(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 9739371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A technique for documenting central placement of long term catheters in neonates.
    Reyna TM; Schropp KP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Nov; 169(5):461-2. PubMed ID: 2814761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Cost comparison of radiologic versus surgical placement of long-term hemodialysis catheters.
    Noh HM; Kaufman JA; Rhea JT; Kim SY; Geller SC; Waltman AC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):673-5. PubMed ID: 10063858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Central venous access: evolving roles of radiology and other specialties nationally over two decades.
    Duszak R; Bilal N; Picus D; Hughes DR; Xu BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Aug; 10(8):603-12. PubMed ID: 23770064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Long-term venous access].
    Pector JC; Guenier C; Libotte F; Gérard A
    Rev Med Brux; 1991 Nov; 12(9):355-8. PubMed ID: 1754771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.