These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. What is the logic in mixing data and beliefs? Brown PM Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 17256805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistics and the relationship of clinical research to clinical practice. Khuder SA; Kahaleh B J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 19208555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating statistics in clinical trials: making the unintelligible intelligible. Gilmore SJ Australas J Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 49(4):177-84; quiz 185-6. PubMed ID: 18855776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The case for frequentism in clinical trials. Whitehead J Stat Med; 1993 Aug; 12(15-16):1405-13; discussion 1415-9. PubMed ID: 8248654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Purposefulness of using fuzzy logic approaches in the rare disease clinical trials]. Kiseleva TS; Pagava KI; Korinteli IA; Korinteli MG; Shonvadze DN Georgian Med News; 2011 Apr; (193):22-4. PubMed ID: 21617269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Studying the prevention of acute kidney injury: lessons from an 18th-century mathematician. Chertow GM; Palevsky PM; Greene T Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):1124-7. PubMed ID: 17699335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule]. Vermeulen M Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2421-4. PubMed ID: 11776667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests. Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative, qualitative and emergent approaches to chiropractic research: a philosophical background. Mealing D J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 9567241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based healthcare, clinical knowledge and the rise of personalised medicine. Miles A; Loughlin M; Polychronis A J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):621-49. PubMed ID: 19018885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence]. Taube A; Malmquist J Lakartidningen; 2001 Jul; 98(28-29):3208-11. PubMed ID: 11496808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical trials in implant therapy: relationships among methodological, statistical, clinical, paratextual features and number of citations. Nieri M; Clauser C; Franceschi D; Pagliaro U; Saletta D; Pini-Prato G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 17517060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 31st Annual Conference of the International Society for Clinical Biostatistics. Preface. Lesaffre E; Gerds T Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1001. PubMed ID: 22585410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian clinical trials. Berry DA Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2006 Jan; 5(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16485344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonparametric empirical Bayes method for comparison of treatment effects with application to stress urinary incontinence data. Liu C; Shen W; Xie J Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17311241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size and the probability of a successful trial. Chuang-Stein C Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 17128428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]