236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10367861)
1. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for microsurgical vasovasostomy in rats.
Sheynkin YR; Li PS; Magid ML; Carlson D; Chen EC; Goldstein M
Urology; 1999 Jun; 53(6):1235-8. PubMed ID: 10367861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 10-0 polypropylene and 10-0 nylon sutures in rat arterial anastomosis.
Chen LE; Seaber AV; Urbaniak JR
Microsurgery; 1993; 14(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 8332053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of microsurgical vasovasostomy techniques in the rat.
Borau Durán A; Ponce de León Roca J
Eur Urol; 1990; 17(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 2190841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in microsurgery: standardized comparable studies in rats.
Thiede A; Lütjohann K; Beck C; Blunck F
J Microsurg; 1979; 1(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 16317948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microvascular anastomoses in growing vessels: a long-term evaluation of nonabsorbable suture materials.
Chen LE; Seaber AV; Urbaniak JR
J Reconstr Microsurg; 1993 May; 9(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 8515396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fibrin glue vasal anastomosis compared to conventional sutured vasovasostomy in the rat.
Silverstein JI; Mellinger BC
J Urol; 1991 Jun; 145(6):1288-91. PubMed ID: 2033718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a sutureless vasovasostomy: use of biomaterials and surgical sealants in a rodent vasovasostomy model.
Schiff J; Li PS; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1192-5. PubMed ID: 15311068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of saline conditions on the tensile strength of ophthalmic sutures.
Brauner SC; Berry JL; Pye J; Lee EG; Rhee DJ
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 21117584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of vasovasostomy techniques in rats utilizing conventional microsurgical suture, carbon dioxide laser, and fibrin tissue adhesives.
Ball RA; Steinberg J; Wilson LA; Loughlin KR
Urology; 1993 May; 41(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 8488619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of absorbable suture for microvascular anastomoses.
Fried MP; Caminear DS; Sloman-Moll ER
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Sep; 116(9):1051-4. PubMed ID: 2200441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the Choice of Suture Materials Affect the Vas Deferens after Hernia Ring Closure in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: An Experimental Study in Rats.
Fung AC; Ye HY; Lau TW; Lui VC; Wong KK
J Pediatr Surg; 2023 Jul; 58(7):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 36894446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absorbable or nonabsorbable suture material for microsurgical tubal anastomosis. Randomized experimental study on rabbits.
Scheidel PH; Wallwiener DR; Holländer D; Hepp HK
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 21(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 3957133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Retrospective analysis of factors affecting patency rates and causes of failure in use of single-armed two-suture microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].
Tang SX; Zhou HL; Ding YL; Yang P; Chen Q; Chen X
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 98(46):3741-3745. PubMed ID: 30541214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of vasovasostomy with conventional microsurgical suture and fibrin adhesive in rats.
Busato WF; Marquetti AM; Rocha LC
Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(6):829-36. PubMed ID: 18199352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fertility after autotransposition of vas: a comparative study of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture material in rats.
Carringer M; Pedersen J; Schnürer LB
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1996 Feb; 30(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 8727859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial.
Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective controlled study of a 10/0 absorbable polyglactin suture for corneal incision phacoemulsification.
Bainbridge JW; Teimory M; Kirwan JF; Rostron CK
Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 3a)():399-402. PubMed ID: 9775239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Buried absorbable polyglactin 910 sutures do not result in stronger wounds in porcine full thickness skin incisions.
Townsend KL; Lear W; Robertson BL; Kruzic JJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():386-389. PubMed ID: 27454524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel technique for vas deferens transection repairs.
Ozen IO; Bagbanci B; Demirtola A; Karabulut R; Ozen O; Demirogullari B; Turkyilmaz Z; Sonmez K; Basaklar AC; Kale N
Pediatr Surg Int; 2006 Oct; 22(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 16902807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
