These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care. Rothschild RD Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Health care regulation via PSRO: the management control system of concurrent stay review. Dittman DA Socioecon Issues Health; 1980; ():39-57. PubMed ID: 10309697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. PSROs: waiver liability, confidentiality -- and new developments. Part III. Weissburg C; Waxman JM Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(2):51, 53-5. PubMed ID: 10273243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The evaluation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: their part in the struggle to assure appropriate health care. Davis FA Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 6810978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Enhancing utilization review program results. Martin M; Milstein A; Loveland DV Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 10286636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Evaluation of the cost effectiveness and quality of hospital treatment: the American Medicare Peer Review Organization model]. Kersting T; Eichhorn S Chirurg; 1994 Nov; 65(11):suppl 235-41. PubMed ID: 7821056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]