These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10368193)
1. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization. Pachler J; Frimodt-Møller C BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):767-9. PubMed ID: 10368193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study. Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the microbiological milieu of patients randomized to either hydrophilic or conventional PVC catheters for clean intermittent catheterization. Lucas EJ; Baxter C; Singh C; Mohamed AZ; Li B; Zhang J; Jayanthi VR; Koff SA; VanderBrink B; Justice SS J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Jun; 12(3):172.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26951923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection. Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Johansson K; Greis G; Johansson B; Grundtmann A; Pahlby Y; Törn S; Axelberg H; Carlsson P Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 22762536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review. Shamout S; Biardeau X; Corcos J; Campeau L Spinal Cord; 2017 Jul; 55(7):629-643. PubMed ID: 28117329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomized crossover study. Giannantoni A; Di Stasi SM; Scivoletto G; Virgili G; Dolci S; Porena M J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 11435839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters. Stensballe J; Looms D; Nielsen PN; Tvede M Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 16126331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials. Witjes JA; Del Popolo G; Marberger M; Jonsson O; Kaps HP; Chapple CR J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2794-8. PubMed ID: 19837425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel product for intermittent catheterisation: its impact on compliance with daily life--international multicentre study. Bjerklund Johansen T; Hultling C; Madersbacher H; Del Popolo G; Amarenco G; Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 17166653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parent and child experiences using a hydrophilic or reused PVC catheter for intermittent catheterisation. Chick HE; Hunter KF; Moore KN J Clin Nurs; 2013 Feb; 22(3-4):513-20. PubMed ID: 22827882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study of the degree of patient satisfaction in intermittent catheterization with Lofric and polyvinyl chloride catheters]. López Pereira P; Martínez Urrutia MJ; Lobato L; Rivas S; Jaureguizar Monereo E Actas Urol Esp; 2001; 25(10):725-30. PubMed ID: 11803779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization. Chartier-Kastler E; Amarenco G; Lindbo L; Soljanik I; Andersen HL; Bagi P; Gjødsbøl K; Domurath B J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):942-7. PubMed ID: 23587630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of hydrophilic polymer-coated latex, uncoated latex and PVC indwelling balloon catheters in the prevention of urinary infection. Tidd MJ; Gow JG; Pennington JH; Shelton J; Scott MR Br J Urol; 1976 Aug; 48(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 963410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the use of Urocath-Gel catheters for intermittent self-catheterization by male patients using conventional catheters for a long time. Wyndaele J; De Ridder D; Everaert K; Heilporn A; Congard-Chassol B Spinal Cord; 2000 Feb; 38(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 10762182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. Diokno AC; Mitchell BA; Nash AJ; Kimbrough JA J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 7815580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. InstantCath from Hollister: pre-lubricated self-catheterization. Easton S Br J Nurs; 2000 Mar 23-Apr 12; 9(6):357-60. PubMed ID: 11051886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meatal strictures after transurethral prostatectomy using latex or polyvinyl chloride three-way catheters. Goodwin MI; Chester JF Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Mar; 72(2):125-7. PubMed ID: 2185681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]