These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10368199)
1. A comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma. Ekici S; Ozen H; Ağildere M; Ergen A; Ozkardeş H; Ayhan A; Kendi S BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 10368199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 11121995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining prostrate-specific antigen and Gleason score increases the diagnostic power of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer pathological stage. Tsao CW; Lin MH; Wu ST; Meng E; Tang SH; Chen HI; Sun GH; Yu DS; Chang SY; Cha TL J Chin Med Assoc; 2013 Jan; 76(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23331777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation. Bates TS; Gillatt DA; Cavanagh PM; Speakman M Br J Urol; 1997 Jun; 79(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 9202562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of endorectal nuclear magnetic resonance tomography and transrectal ultrasound diagnosis in local staging of prostatic carcinoma]. May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J Urologe A; 2002 Sep; 41(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 12426863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer. D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Schnall M; Malkowicz SB; Tomaszewski JE; Schultz D; Wein A Cancer; 1995 May; 75(9):2368-72. PubMed ID: 7536124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Accuracy of endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative local staging of prostate cancer]. Baccos A; Schiavina R; Zukerman Z; Busato F; Gaudiano C; Salizzoni E; Fiorentino M; Golfieri R; Martorana G Urologia; 2012; 79(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 22522463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance? Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting extracapsular extension in intermediate and high - risk prostate cancer. Dominguez C; Plata M; Cataño JG; Palau M; Aguirre D; Narvaez J; Trujillo S; Gómez F; Trujillo CG; Caicedo JI; Medina C Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(4):688-696. PubMed ID: 29570254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Preoperative endorectal MRI in prostate cancer: a monocentric retrospective cohort]. de Vendin C; Eydant Y; Ecochard R; Lorin S; Lacroix B; Lardon R; Mottet N Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(16):1412-8. PubMed ID: 24274946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Staging of prostatic carcinoma: TRUS prospective study versus endocoil MRI]. Mearini L; Rosi P; Zucchi A; Mearini E; Vivacqua C; Salomone U; Regi L; Porena M Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Dec; 74(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 12508760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer. Boesen L Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. Selli C; Caramella D; Giusti S; Conti A; Tognetti A; Mogorovich A; De Maria M; Bartolozzi C Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17310289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging and clinical methods. Huch Böni RA; Boner JA; Debatin JF; Trinkler F; Knönagel H; Von Hochstetter A; Helfenstein U; Krestin GP Clin Radiol; 1995 Sep; 50(9):593-600. PubMed ID: 7554732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Sheu MH; Wang JH; Chen KK; Chiang H; Teng MH Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1998 May; 61(5):243-52. PubMed ID: 9650427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concordance of preoperative prostate endorectal MRI with subsequent prostatectomy specimen in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Nepple KG; Rosevear HM; Stolpen AH; Brown JA; Williams RD Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):601-6. PubMed ID: 21665495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma. Tarcan T; Türkeri L; Biren T; Küllü S; Gürmen N; Akdaş A Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(6):773-9. PubMed ID: 9089045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer. Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]