BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10368199)

  • 1. A comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma.
    Ekici S; Ozen H; Ağildere M; Ergen A; Ozkardeş H; Ayhan A; Kendi S
    BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 10368199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
    BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 11121995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining prostrate-specific antigen and Gleason score increases the diagnostic power of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer pathological stage.
    Tsao CW; Lin MH; Wu ST; Meng E; Tang SH; Chen HI; Sun GH; Yu DS; Chang SY; Cha TL
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2013 Jan; 76(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23331777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation.
    Bates TS; Gillatt DA; Cavanagh PM; Speakman M
    Br J Urol; 1997 Jun; 79(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 9202562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Significance of endorectal nuclear magnetic resonance tomography and transrectal ultrasound diagnosis in local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
    May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
    Urologe A; 2002 Sep; 41(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 12426863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 11C-choline positron-emission tomography/computed tomography and transrectal ultrasonography for staging localized prostate cancer.
    Rinnab L; Blumstein NM; Mottaghy FM; Hautmann RE; Küfer R; Hohl K; Reske SN
    BJU Int; 2007 Jun; 99(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 17355373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.
    Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Schnall M; Malkowicz SB; Tomaszewski JE; Schultz D; Wein A
    Cancer; 1995 May; 75(9):2368-72. PubMed ID: 7536124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Accuracy of endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative local staging of prostate cancer].
    Baccos A; Schiavina R; Zukerman Z; Busato F; Gaudiano C; Salizzoni E; Fiorentino M; Golfieri R; Martorana G
    Urologia; 2012; 79(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 22522463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
    Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting extracapsular extension in intermediate and high - risk prostate cancer.
    Dominguez C; Plata M; Cataño JG; Palau M; Aguirre D; Narvaez J; Trujillo S; Gómez F; Trujillo CG; Caicedo JI; Medina C
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(4):688-696. PubMed ID: 29570254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preoperative endorectal MRI in prostate cancer: a monocentric retrospective cohort].
    de Vendin C; Eydant Y; Ecochard R; Lorin S; Lacroix B; Lardon R; Mottet N
    Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(16):1412-8. PubMed ID: 24274946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Staging of prostatic carcinoma: TRUS prospective study versus endocoil MRI].
    Mearini L; Rosi P; Zucchi A; Mearini E; Vivacqua C; Salomone U; Regi L; Porena M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Dec; 74(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 12508760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic carcinoma.
    Selli C; Caramella D; Giusti S; Conti A; Tognetti A; Mogorovich A; De Maria M; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17310289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging and clinical methods.
    Huch Böni RA; Boner JA; Debatin JF; Trinkler F; Knönagel H; Von Hochstetter A; Helfenstein U; Krestin GP
    Clin Radiol; 1995 Sep; 50(9):593-600. PubMed ID: 7554732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sheu MH; Wang JH; Chen KK; Chiang H; Teng MH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1998 May; 61(5):243-52. PubMed ID: 9650427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concordance of preoperative prostate endorectal MRI with subsequent prostatectomy specimen in high-risk prostate cancer patients.
    Nepple KG; Rosevear HM; Stolpen AH; Brown JA; Williams RD
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):601-6. PubMed ID: 21665495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma.
    Tarcan T; Türkeri L; Biren T; Küllü S; Gürmen N; Akdaş A
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(6):773-9. PubMed ID: 9089045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer.
    Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P
    Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.